Email Forum Archives (2)

Other Email Forums

About EL

----- Original Message -----
From: Kris P.
To: mmcclellan@adelphia.net
Sent: Sunday, July 26, 2009 4:42 PM
Subject: About EL

Hey Mike.

I like how your article on the Whore of Babylon is turning out, especially the part where you say that Madona is falling into Satans' trap for making an end of the forces of chaos, which is a double blasphemy, because she has only a faint idea of what she's dealing with.

Just one small correction. Marduk and EL are the same god. EL (Deity, Supreme God) comes from BEL, a title which signified supremacy in ancient Babylon (Lord, Master), where BEL was used almost exclusively for Marduk, but BEL or EL was also used to represent the The Sun. The ancient Babylonian gods were all symbols of the SUN, with Marduk being supreme in Babylonia, and Asshur being supreme in Assyria. Practically all other supreme Gods since then come from the supreme solar, Sun god of the Babylonians, like BAAL (BA EL), Elohim (EL ohim),etc, but being renamed later on. Furthermore, Sun worship was always associated with human sacrifice in history. Interesting huh? :)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bel_(god)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/El_(god)

I hope that helps Mike,

May the force be with you!

* * * * *

Hi Kris,

Thank you for your appraisal of the article. I can truly say you are among a few who truly grasp the full meaning of it. I appreciate your correction ... and you may well be right ... but before I continue, you should know the links you provided are pointing to pages that say the following:

Wikipedia does not have an article with this exact name. Please search for Bel (god in Wikipedia to check for alternative titles or spellings.

Wikipedia does not have an article with this exact name. Please search for El (god in Wikipedia to check for alternative titles or spellings.

If one searches enough with the links supplied however, pages do come up with listings of names like Bel, Baal, El Shaddai, Elohim, etc... many suggesting that Bel and El are one. Normally I would have little problem with this, although it appears to me at this time that some scholars have confused El and YHWH (Yahweh) and historically such confusion may have led certain peoples, especially in Babylon, to actually worship YHWH under another name (Marduk) when it is another god they were intending to worship.

This article opened my eyes a bit:

http://the-red-thread.net/IS-RA-EL.html

The following is the concluding paragraph that summarises what the entire page is conerned with:

What I also suggest is that EL and YHWH were two separate 'gods' - see: YHWH as Marduk. So we see that the gods El and Yahweh are distinct gods from each other, as distinct as their individual names. Yahweh was worshipped as a war god from the deserts of southern Palestine who migrated north to Judah while El was the god of Israel whose home was Mesopotamia. Historically speaking, the two gods must be regarded as originally distinct that subsequently were related and finally identified through political and religious syncreticism.
Betty Rhodes

Following the above link to the following page, also on the same website, http://the-red-thread.net/marduk-yhwh-comparisons.html, we find that the author gives us 38 very good reasons to believe that YHWH and Marduk were the same god. Thus, historically, if we believe the author has made a convincing argument that El had nothing to do with Yahweh, that they were considered to be two seperate deities, we must conclude that Marduk and El were NOT the same god, and that we can only speculate from this information that the Babylonians mistakenly believed they were worshipping El, not Yahweh, as Marduk (as the god of Babylon was hated by Yahweh). As the author Rhodes reminds us, "the two gods (El and Yahweh) must be regarded as originally distinct that subsequently were related..." That is to say, by relating them, they were confused with one another by certain peoples.

This confusion, I believe, eventually corrected itself as Rhodes concludes "(El and YHWH were) finally identified through political and religious syncreticism." Thus, El was finally worshipped in his many forms as Baal and Ba'al Hammon (Lord Hamman or God Hammon). El, always the horned god since antiquity, became the ultimate horned god as he was then represented by a bull or an ox.

It is Baal then that Nostradamus, knowing his gods well, is relating to the powerful "dame" who "puts the Innocents to the fire" before being consumed "by the true flame" herself. When this will happen, I do not know. I do know that Madonna has a strong attraction to Spain and its culture, and it is in Spain that the monstrous ox (Baal) is seen. She will also put on the mantle of the goddess Ishtar, who was linked to Marduk (Yahweh), but certainly not out of reverence to Yahweh, but rather, because Ishtar was regarded as "Queen of Heaven" and was so utterly licentious, like the Whore of Babylon, and drunken with the blood of those sacrificed in her name at orgies and other rituals and festivities.

This historical confusion, in any event, will likely be lost upon most viewers who read the article, and, it is only necessary that they come to know that Madonna, as the Whore of Babylon and Queen of Heaven will bring about a return to Baal worship and human sacrifice (on a massive scale).

Thanks again for your interest and your help.

Mike

----- Original Message -----
From: Kris P.
To: mmcclellan@adelphia.net
Sent: Sunday, August 02, 2009 2:35 AM
Subject: RE: About EL

Hi mike,

Good to hear from you. If your assistant Kathryn read my email, she probably thought, Oh no, not another discussion on ancient gods with this guy, I'm going to leave it to Mike, lol .

Anyways, the reason i sent you those links was because i needed a quick reference as backing for my claims for the definitions of these names (which I am well familiar with), and I thought Wikipedia would be the fastest way to get those. I honestly didn't read the entire links, just made sure the definitions were correct, and went with them.

I dislike using wikipedia as a source, but it can be useful ocasionally. What I wanted to use was a certain old text, but i had to re-read through it first to get the quotes I wanted. The current knowledge (which is not new) I have on those gods came to me in a life changing book. A few years ago I was able to acquire a certain ancient (actual 100 year old book) called:
The Historical Bases Of Religions: Primitive-Babylonian-And Jewish by Hiram Chellis Brown, 1906.

I urge you to seek it out if you are serious about ancient religions. I will try to summarize what I wanted and want to tell you about Marduk, Bel, Baal and El in a few quotes that will be a more clear expression of what I wanted to say in the first place. Here they are:

"Enlil, or Bel was father of Marduk, who in later ages became the supreme god of Babylonia, and in whom the attributes of all the other gods were finally merged. The worship of Bel was universal throughout the country, and it extended so far into the prehistoric past as to make Nippur a religious centre, and give it a sacred character and prestige that could only come with a long period of political and prestigious prominence (page 55)."

"...all or. at any rate, the highest deities in the Babylonian pantheon are designated as one with, and one in, the god Marduk.
The god Nin-ib is Marduk as being Possesor of Power.
The god Nergal is Marduk as being Lord of the Conflict of Battle.
The god Bel is Marduk as being Possesor of Lordship (Supreme Lord).
The god Nebu is Marduk as being God of Industry and Trade.
The god Sin is Marduk as being illuminator of the Night.
The god Samas is Marduk as being god of the Day, and Lord of all that is just.
The god Addu is Marduk as being god of Rain.
...Marduk accordingly is Nin-ib as well as Nergal, moon-god as well as sun-god, and so on,- the names Nin-ib and Nergal, Sin and Samas, are simply different ways of describing the one god Marduk; they are all one with him and in him (page 95-96)."

"As the people of Israel became agriculturists, they brought their offerings to agricultural divinities, whose shrines were found on every hill-top, under every green tree, and by every flowing spring. There the various gods, - Jehovah, Milcom (Moloch), Chemosh, Astarte and others, - under the comprehensive title of El, Bel, or Baal, were invited to feast with their worshippers and sanctify with their presence the orgies that followed (page 162)."

The author states (and I have to agree with him) that the mythologies of different civilizations (and cultures) don't complement and match each other perfectly like the pieces of a giant puzzle into a neatly and tightly formed picture. They do not! But I do believe however that the ancient religions (Egyptian, Sumerian, Vedic) had their source in a pre-dilluvial religion and civilization like that of Atlantis, and as the millenia passed these close fitting pieces become more numerous and less compatible to each other.

The author talks a lot about the israelites. What i found really significant was that, the Israelite/Jews become much more monotheistic during the time of and after their conquest by the Assyrians. This was only due to the effect the highly developed monotheistic religion of the warrior Assyrians had on the Jewish priesthood, passed to them by the mighty Babylonian civilization.

Now about that author who claims that Marduk and YHWH are the same god and then claims they're not the same god. This is hypocrisy, and from experience I dislike hypocrits, and have to label those claims as conceit which is common among such people. And i adhere to Jesus here, as he reproached hypocrats and liars. I would say they are closer than they are further in the ideology of a monotheistic god.

However, you must know that this author makes claims and assumptions that are wrong. I'm not going to go debunk every claim he makes but, for example Bel/Marduk existed hundreds if not thousand years before anyone mentioned of YHWH! I have yet to see evidence of YHWH worship before the time of Moses, 1500-1600BC, so a 2000 BC claim for YHWH is frivilous. But even even with that date, Marduk still predates him. The Late Sumerian/ Early Babylonian civilizations date to around 4000 B.C., the age of Taurus (The Bull), thus you see the half bull, half man, anthropomorphic creatures that were carved as holy guardians/watchers/cherubim, by the very astro-theologically aware Babylonians and Sumerians. Lets remember that Abraham the father of the Jews, emerged from Mesopotamia around 2000B.C. into the Canaanite regions where Baal worship was already evolving. Mesopotamia at that time was the Babylonian culture! Whose alphabet did the jews adopt later on? the Phoenicians'. The Phoenicians and Chaldeans and others were heavily religiously and otherwise influenced by the Babylonians from whom the jews heavily borrowed.

Furthermore the planet of Marduk is Jupiter (like Zeus') which is closer to a star than a planet. Let's remember that the cuneiform for a God in Babylonia is the Star!

Finally, how can Marduk, the god of Babylonia, claim that the god of Babylon is its enemy? That would mean Marduk is his own enemy! lol

Anyways, it is perhaps irrelevant whether YHWH is a prototype of of the Egyptian Solar deity RA, or of Bel/El, or both, because like i stated above, these are ideologically the same monotheistic deity, which was imparted on those civilizations by an event more ancient and forgoten civilization. Yet, I am firmly convinced that all these gods RA,BEL,YHWH, whether one believes are the same or not, even though "monotheistic" deities, which they're not really, are pagan in their nature. And perhaps this very fact, holds secrets to the nature of a pre-dilluvial, long forgoten, and decadent civilization and perhaps even to our own "advanced" one.

Yours truly,

* * * * *

Hi Kris,

I think I created some confusion with the associations I read on that website. Although in the final analysis I find myself agreeing with your current email, I do not see that she has contradicted herself. I will try to simplify what associations she made:

The author was saying El and YHWH (Yahweh) were not the same god on one page (El does not = YHWH).

Then on another page she said that Marduk and YHWH were the same god (Marduk = YHWH).

The conclusion, therefore, if both cases were true, would logically be that El and Marduk were not the same god or related (El does not = YHWH).

However, I bow to the knowledge and expertise of the book and author you have cited. I believe you have dismissed the findings published on the above author's website, irregardless of your misunderstanding what that author was saying.

Therefore there will be no reason to correct what I said in my 2008 article concerning Madonna on the Personalities From The Book Of Revelation page, but the current article on the Second Home page will have to be tweaked in a few locations.

Eventually, both articles will be merged on the Personalities From The Book Of Revelation page.

Thank you for the clarification.

Kind regards,

Mike

---------

Hi again Kris,

I know I have answered this email already, but Kathryn also wants to make a reply. Thanks.

Mike

.........

Hi Kris P

Thank you very much for taking the time to explain to Mike and I about your findings. To be honest Mike is far more educated on such matters than I am. At this present time we choose (myself backing Mike's article) to make those remarks about Marduk, because we have to put things across as we see them at that time. I am not saying who is right and who is wrong, but history has been so confused it is hard to tell who was who. Please do not take this as discouragement. We see your point. And we truly appreciate your help on clearing this matter up. But our goal is to get to the truth and tell what we know so that people can judge for themselves. If along the way a few things may appear wrong, that is ok for the time being, because often the wrong answers can lead us to the right ones. We just have to make sure they are wrong first.*LOL*

Kind regards Kathryn.

The Book of Enoch

----- Original Message -----
From: Michael Skøtt Andersen
To: Michael McClellan
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 1:11 PM
Subject: The Book of Enoch

Hi Mike and Kathryn

Kathryn you ask the following:

Has humanity for thousands of years been part of a breeding programme ordered by God? An experiment to manipulate species from different races to create one single entity that fulfills all his requirements? One that has been genetically modified by his sons of God, or Aliens as we know them, in order to reach a perfected final goal?

In Revelation 12 its says :
Woe to the inhabitants of the earth and the sea! For the devil has come down to you, having great wrath, because he knows that he has a short time.
Could it be that part of his wrath is to make experiments on humans ?

If you read the following excerpt from "The book of Enoch" You will see that the "fallen angels" or as they are described elsewhere "the sons of God" did not take women as their wives in
accordance with Gods orders.
They did it in disobedience to his law. This is quite clear in chapter 10.
In the book of Enoch the fallen angels are also refered to as the Watchers.

[Chapter 6]
1 And it came to pass when the children of men had multiplied that in those days were born unto
2 them beautiful and comely daughters. And the angels, the children of the heaven, saw and lusted
after them, and said to one another: 'Come, let us choose us wives from among the children of men
3 and beget us children.' And Semjaza, who was their leader, said unto them: 'I fear ye will not
4 indeed agree to do this deed, and I alone shall have to pay the penalty of a great sin.' And they all
answered him and said: 'Let us all swear an oath, and all bind ourselves by mutual imprecations
5 not to abandon this plan but to do this thing.' Then sware they all together and bound themselves
6 by mutual imprecations upon it. And they were in all two hundred; who descended in the days of
Jared on the summit of Mount Hermon, and they called it Mount Hermon, because they had sworn
7 and bound themselves by mutual imprecations upon it. And these are the names of their leaders:
Samlazaz, their leader, Araklba, Rameel, Kokablel, Tamlel, Ramlel, Danel, Ezeqeel, Baraqijal,
8 Asael, Armaros, Batarel, Ananel, Zaq1el, Samsapeel, Satarel, Turel, Jomjael, Sariel. These are
their chiefs of tens.

[Chapter 7]
1 And all the others together with them took unto themselves wives, and each chose for himself one,
and they began to go in unto them and to defile themselves with them, and they taught them charms
2 and enchantments, and the cutting of roots, and made them acquainted with plants. And they
3 became pregnant, and they bare great giants, whose height was three thousand ells: Who consumed
4 all the acquisitions of men. And when men could no longer sustain them, the giants turned against
5 them and devoured mankind. And they began to sin against birds, and beasts, and reptiles, and
6 fish, and to devour one another's flesh, and drink the blood. Then the earth laid accusation against the
lawless ones.

[Chapter 8]
1 And Azazel taught men to make swords, and knives, and shields, and breastplates, and made known
to them the metals of the earth and the art of working them, and bracelets, and ornaments, and the use
of antimony, and the beautifying of the eyelids, and all kinds of costly stones, and all
2 colouring tinctures. And there arose much godlessness, and they committed fornication, and they
3 were led astray, and became corrupt in all their ways. Semjaza taught enchantments, and root-cuttings,
'Armaros the resolving of enchantments, Baraqijal (taught) astrology, Kokabel the constellations, Ezeqeel
the knowledge of the clouds, Araqiel the signs of the earth, Shamsiel the signs of the sun, and Sariel the
course of the moon. And as men perished, they cried, and their cry went up to heaven . . .

[Chapter 9]
1 And then Michael, Uriel, Raphael, and Gabriel looked down from heaven and saw much blood being
2 shed upon the earth, and all lawlessness being wrought upon the earth. And they said one to another:
'The earth made without inhabitant cries the voice of their cryingst up to the gates of heaven.
3 And now to you, the holy ones of heaven, the souls of men make their suit, saying, "Bring our cause
4 before the Most High."' And they said to the Lord of the ages: 'Lord of lords, God of gods, King of kings,
and God of the ages, the throne of Thy glory (standeth) unto all the generations of the
5 ages, and Thy name holy and glorious and blessed unto all the ages! Thou hast made all things, and power
over all things hast Thou: and all things are naked and open in Thy sight, and Thou seest all
6 things, and nothing can hide itself from Thee. Thou seest what Azazel hath done, who hath taught all
unrighteousness on earth and revealed the eternal secrets which were (preserved) in heaven, which
7 men were striving to learn: And Semjaza, to whom Thou hast given authority to bear rule over his associates.
And they have gone to the daughters of men upon the earth, and have slept with the
9 women, and have defiled themselves, and revealed to them all kinds of sins. And the women have
10 borne giants, and the whole earth has thereby been filled with blood and unrighteousness. And now, behold,
the souls of those who have died are crying and making their suit to the gates of heaven, and their lamentations
have ascended: and cannot cease because of the lawless deeds which are
11 wrought on the earth. And Thou knowest all things before they come to pass, and Thou seest these things and
Thou dost suffer them, and Thou dost not say to us what we are to do to them in regard to these.'

[Chapter 10]
1 Then said the Most High, the Holy and Great One spake, and sent Uriel to the son of Lamech,
2 and said to him: 'Go to Noah and tell him in my name "Hide thyself!" and reveal to him the end that approaching:
that the whole earth will be destroyed, and a deluge is about to come
3 upon the whole earth, and will destroy all that is on it. And now instruct him that he may escape
4 and his seed may be preserved for all the generations of the world.' And again the Lord said to Raphael: 'Bind Azazel
hand and foot, and cast him into the darkness: and make an opening
5 in the desert, which is in Dudael, and cast him therein. And place upon him rough and jagged rocks, and cover him with
darkness, and let him abide there for ever, and cover his face that he may
6,7 not see light. And on the day of the great judgement he shall be cast into the fire. And heal the earth which the angels
have corrupted, and proclaim the healing of the earth, that they may heal the plague, and that all the children of men may
not perish through all the secret things that the
8 Watchers have disclosed and have taught their sons. And the whole earth has been corrupted
9 through the works that were taught by Azazel: to him ascribe all sin.' And to Gabriel said the Lord: 'Proceed against the
bastards and the reprobates, and against the children of fornication: and destroy [the children of fornication and] the children
of the Watchers from amongst men [and cause them to go forth]: send them one against the other that they may destroy
each other in
10 battle: for length of days shall they not have. And no request that they (i.e. their fathers) make of thee shall be granted
unto their fathers on their behalf; for they hope to live an eternal life, and
11 that each one of them will live five hundred years.' And the Lord said unto Michael: 'Go, bind Semjaza and his associates
who have united themselves with women so as to have defiled themselves
12 with them in all their uncleanness. And when their sons have slain one another, and they have seen the destruction of their
beloved ones, bind them fast for seventy generations in the valleys of the earth, till the day of their judgement and of their
consummation, till the judgement that is
13 for ever and ever is consummated. In those days they shall be led off to the abyss of fire: and
14 to the torment and the prison in which they shall be confined for ever. And whosoever shall be condemned and destroyed
will from thenceforth be bound together with them to the end of all
15 generations. And destroy all the spirits of the reprobate and the children of the Watchers, because
16 they have wronged mankind. Destroy all wrong from the face of the earth and let every evil work come to an end: and let the
plant of righteousness and truth appear: and it shall prove a blessing; the works of righteousness and truth' shall be planted
in truth and joy for evermore.

I have attached the full text of " The book of Enoch" . I hope you will find it useful.

Luke 17:26-30 (NIV)
"Just as it was in the days of Noah, so also will it be in the days of the Son of Man. People were eating, drinking, marrying and being given in marriage up to the day Noah entered the ark.
Then the flood came and destroyed them all. "It was the same in the days of Lot. People were eating and drinking, buying and selling, planting and building. But the day Lot left Sodom,
fire and sulfur rained down from heaven and destroyed them all. "It will be just like this on the day the Son of Man is revealed.

My point is that if God had not wiped out the majority of humanity , then we as a race would probably have succeeded in killing of ourselves together with all life on this planet a long time ago..
So according to Luke we are in for a hefty ride soon. Humanity will suffer both floods and fire from the sky, and ..
Oh I almost forgot.. alien intervention.

Friendly greetings

Michael Skøtt Andersen / Copenhagen d'Annemarc

*** * * * ***

Hi Michael,

Reading the excerpt you sent me from the book of Enoch, I can see why you would make the assumption that God had not sent the sons of God. But note the Bible calls them sons of God, and I think that is with good reason. I plan to say more on Mike's website, but I have to be careful how I do this. I do not wish to be misinterpreted and want to make my words very clear. I do not wish to upset certain powers that be either, but I strongly suspect they are being tricked with the promise of (false) technology. I DO believe these aliens are Satanic in nature and that certain agencies are having dealings with them. But I also am suspicious of what they have come here for. After all the evidence I have seen so far, this concludes me to believe that God is behind their motions, not Satan as it seems.

With regards,

Kathryn

NEWS FLASH on CNN , RAY MABUS named civilian leader of Navy

----- Original Message -----
From: Michael Skøtt Andersen
To: Michael McClellan
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2009 7:03 PM
Subject: NEWS FLASH on CNN , RAY MABUS named civilian leader of Navy

Hi Mike

I just got a chock. I was working on my computer when there was a news flash on CNN that president Obama names Ray Mabus as the next secretary of the Navy.

http://blogs.knoxnews.com/knx/fredbrown/2009/03/ray_mabus
_eyed_as_next_navy_se.html

http://www.nndb.com/people/688/000121325/

I know that we should be expecting MABUS, but RAY, Could he then possible be mentioned in

C9 Q44
Leave, leave Geneva every last one of you,
Saturn will be converted from gold to iron,
"Raypoz" will exterminate all who oppose him,
Before the coming the sky will show signs.

RAY MABUS, Raypoz ?????

I know what you could be thinking, that possibly I am getting a bit to fond of C9 Q44.

I hope that your fathers situation has improved, and the same for you.

Friendly greeetings from

Michael Skøtt Andersen / Copenhagen d'Annemarc

*** * * * ***

Thanks Mike.

As most of the dream visions I have had about World War III seem centred on the early stages in the form of horrendous naval battles and attacks on US warships, and that if we should bypass WW3 this year then I believe a great naval blockade in the Persian Gulf by Russia and Iran will be the big trigger a few years from now, Mabus being in position as secretary of the navy is something that should concern us all. Even Nostradamus and certain prophets like Alois Irlmaier reveal in their WW3 scenarios that the coming war requires great naval conflicts to occur both before and during.

This would appear to kill the idea of Obama being Mabus, I dare say (at least for as long as Ray Mabus remains in the position of sec of navy).

As for Raypoz, I realise a nuclear sub in the Mediterranean can reach even a landlocked, mountainous Alp nation like Switzerland (Geneva) with an SLBM, but I really do suspect Nostradamus foresaw an actual invasion by land troops and air forces when he wrote this quatrain, although there is no doubt that a nuclear attack is also possible. In another quatrain, for example, a seven-million man army from North Africa actually invades Switzerland via the Jura Mountains and moves on to attack Geneva. So, I really think Raypoz (which was capitalised in original manuscript by Nostradamus as "RAYPOZ") is an evil antichrist type, but from what country we do not yet know, although "poz" makes one think of a Russian name. Hard as it may be to accept, I still think this is a future fourth world war (or else a postponed World War III that begins in 2038 if we manage to avoid one in the next few years).

Best regards,

Mike

NOTE: I see I was also asked about the state of my health and that of my fathers'. Sadly, my father has been diagnosed with stomach cancer. However, a medication he will soon be taking gives him a 75% chance or better of controlling it or curing it. It is not chemo, nor does he fall into the category of "terminal," so there is much hope. But he is in much pain at this time and has little or no appetite. My mother, to make matters worse, who is crippled with arthritis and a diabetic, has suddenly begun to lose sight in one eye. I will be taking her to see a specialist in a few days. As for myself, the gout in both my feet has been ongoing for six weeks, but not too bad during the last few days. It is possible I am passing from the stage where one gets periodic "attacks" of gout to a chronic stage. I hope not ... it is too soon really for that. In any event, the rollercoaster ride continues and it doesn't look like any of us is getting off any time soon ... MM

FEMA Camps

----- Original Message -----
From: lance poe
To: mmcclellan@roadrunner.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 7:10 PM
Subject: Just saying hi

Hello,

My name is Lance Poe I am writing you regarding your web-site.

First, I would like to say that I am very impressed with its content and think that your accuracy rate is very good. Typically I read the book of Revelations and have been trying to piece together the various components of the book in reflection to modern day problems. Your web-site gives me another eye on the matter and I appreciate it much. As a tool I like to see how other ideas correspond to each other and your site tends to include other prophecies by people that I never even knew existed, once again thanks for that I have been looking them up as well.

In researching the different explanations of what is to come, one stands out the most to me and has me very concerned. Some seem to think that FEMA has concentration camps spread throughout our country and are there for the soul purpose of imprisoning people on a mass scale. They even go as far to say that they are basically Death Camps for the non-conformers. Some of these camps are reported to be able to hold a couple thousand people in them. Times that by 2,000 camps and you get a pretty daunting number of people that could be detained.

In one of your assumptions you state the in March 09 the US will fall under attack by a biological agent or even nuclear; A.A. Allen’s reflection of this was even more disturbing as to the use of the statue of Liberty in his dream state.

My question to you is do you think that due to this attack which may come at any day now enables the Executive Power for Marshall Law and start shipping people off to these camps? And to what extreme do you think these events will be; some past predictions don’t seem as extreme as to what really happened. Have you thought of any way to fine tune your methods so you can get a feel of the level of damage that may coincide with a particular event? Example: if the Queen of England has a minor stroke instead of dies this month then how do you consider that to be fulfilled, is it half full or half empty? Is there a way to recognize a total wipe out so to speak then just a little hiccup in the time line.

Lastly, why bother imprisoning a bunch of people when in time everything will be taken care of by some other event. I can handle comets coming out of the sky, I can handle massive sun expulsions hitting the earth and burning people up. I can even handle the anti-Christ, and nuclear war but this thing about people going to their end in an American Death Camp is just incredible. It’s a War within our own country and it’s us against our government… I am not saying that it can’t happen because if Hitler can get people to hate and kill as he did then any good politician especially one that has a good command of his speech abilities as Barak can.

Is there a way to fathom the severity of a particular event? I know sometimes when I see things a lesser form of that vision happens.

Some of the things you suggest just for this year are nothing short of apocalyptic in terms. I personally think that it is time for man to change and that all of these events prescribed by all these different sources will lead him to his evolution in mind, body, and soul. And I believe that it is time to pay for our arrogance and it time to move forward. It’s time to realize that we are unique beings and we should be worshiping that fact everyday.

I just want to be sure that when I come across these predictions is how strongly I should take them. I am going to watch them unfold anyway, no matter what. But I like to stay ahead of them so I can be on higher ground if need me… I promised I would keep track of these things so I could watch them happen so a good heads up is great. But some of these things are too far out there almost dramatized I think.

Any way thanks for put up your site I am keeping track…

*** * * * ***

Hello Lance,

The FEMA camps being detention or death camps is a very old idea and an endless subject to be found on conspiracy forums ... if you look around the internet you will still find web pages warning about them back when Bill Clinton was president. It would not surprise me if there once were sites back in the Bush Sr. administration warning about them since the Internet's first year was 1989.

During a time of economic collapse and possible global war their existence to some extent is logical. Martial Law throughout the United States during a time of great crisis will be very hard to enforce.

I hate to say it, but based on some of the dreams I have had, these camps may be no worse than the alternative. I have seen groups of three-to-five innocent-looking people, men and women, walking down suburban streets, one of their number walking up to a door and knocking, and then the person who answers is shot to death and the people go inside and kill everybody there, looting the home. Down the street the same thing happening at another house, maybe three homes taken over at one time on the same street, everybody killed. People will have no compassion ... no mercy. Everyone will be starving/fighting for food too.

In another dream I walk back to my boyhood home. All the houses are dark, no one inside. I see a dark shape of a person stop and then speed up, flitting down a street a few blocks away like a living shadow. When I get "home" the house looks beautiful, but it is dark and unlived in. Then I see these green snowflakes coming down. I know it is October.

I have seen small cities, towns, and areas of large cities in total blackout at night permanently ... no streetlights or traffic lights working ... ravenous gangs roaming the streets, some of them foaming at the mouth. I am in a car and I pull up to a house. I go inside and gather everyone inside (in the dream I know who they are) and we make it cautiously back to the car ... and get in and take off just as the dark shapes of wild crazies, men and women, run at us. It is truly frightening ... and the fact that it is total darkness with only torches/flashlights working ... driving is unsafe too because it is so dark.

No, I don't much relish the idea of FEMA camps and guillotines and a few million plastic coffins. And I think the idea of A Lists and B Lists is inhuman. I hope none of that is true.

But, based on my dream experiences, I can't say that I much like the alternative either of humanity reverting to lawless bands of psychopathic mobs ...

What it ultimately comes down to, I suppose, is that what these camps are used for is up to us. If we are positive and weather the storms, be they economic, climate-related, war-related or otherwise, these camps will be used for what they are surely in place for now: as emergency centres in the event of more Katrina disasters or a mega-Katrina catastrophe. If, on the other hand, human beings riot, panic and become violent, then our worst nightmares about what these camps are actually for will come true. Then they will become prisons and death camps.

The choice is our own.

Incidentally, there was a prophecy I saw somewhere about the plastic coffins and millions of people being transported to the northwestern US, not to be enslaved or executed in camps, but buried in mass graves. The reason: a horrific natural (or not so natural) disaster that kills millions of people along the east coast. So many die that for identifying the dead there will be no time ... and no time for funerals. Perhaps the US government is preparing for this catastrophe, maybe they know it will come from Planet X, and they know what will happen ... thus the plastic coffins?

Anyway, what I did there was take a very popular conspiracy theory and try to arrive at a base 7 vector for when it might likely happen. What I arrived at was nothing less than frightening. July/August 2009 is exactly around the same time that Iran and Russia commence World War III together against the nations of the West and Planet X becomes visible to all ...

... That is if you buy into the idea that it will all hit the fan this year.

If you have read my updates, then you should know that I am of a mind to believe that we may not face this grand combined disaster of WW3 and PX until 2012 or even later ... and have created a seperate series of pages for 2009 and 2010 reflecting what will happen if we make it at least until December 2012. I also follow the idea of it all hitting the fan this year and the aftermath events that will occur in 2010 as a consequence. What happens in 2010, should World War III/Planet X happen this year, eventually looks like times as they were 220 years ago in their most brutal form.

I call these two alternative scenarios we may find ourselves in, "Crash and Burn 2009" vs "Climax 2012."

We all have choices we must make, and the choices we make collectively will determine which path we will take. If we handle "Climax 2012" correctly, we will return to normal times until at least 2038.

The biological attack scenario, similar to A A Allen's prophecy, was again something I attempted to date using past historical precedents such as the chemical attacks on the Kurds by Saddam in 1988 and the Tokyo subway attacks in March 1995. It is a long shot in my view, and I certainly hope it does not happen.

If you have not read the Introduction to the Base 7 System yet, now would be a good time. If you have, then you will understand what I am about to say.

Time is constructed in such a way so that events of all types will repeat again and again throughout history ... and for the most part they do this in cycles of seven years or in multiples of seven years (such as 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49, 56, 63, 70, even 210, 350, 700 years for that matter, etc etc). Unfortunately, the magnitude or severity of a repeated event can not easily be determined ... you have noted this already by observing "past predictions don’t seem as extreme as to what really happened." Thus, the Russian war in Georgia, for example, was not nearly as long as the Russian war in Chechnya fourteen years earlier (over 18 months long), but certainly just as intense as the opening weeks of December 1994/January 1995. The "Black October" Crash of 2008 has turned out to be much worse than the Crash of 1987, and a second crash is not out of the question; yet we cannot run out of hope either since recovery in November 2010 remains a distinct possibility. Anna Nicole Smith was not the actress that Jean Harlow was who died 70 years earlier under similar circumstances. Personally I think it is too early to say the War in Gaza was a very weak replay of the 1973 October war ... influences from the 1967 war are next to kick in in June 2009, and in between now and then the war in Gaza could be re-ignited in a major way and expand northwards as it did in 2006, only pulling in Syria this time.

Actually, Lance, the more I look over the predictions that were fulfilled, the harder a time I am having finding a mere "little hiccup." Comet McNaught was everything that Ikeya-Seki was in 1965, and comparisons between the two were even made by astronomers .... just as I predicted they would be. Then another fascinating naked-eye comet appeared in October for good measure (viewing conditions were good where I live then, so I did not miss Holmes like I did McNaught). Comets happen all the time??? Not good ones, no. Comet Lulin this year did not rise above magnitude 5, invisible to most eyes save in country dark 20 miles away or more from the nearest town, and even then a mere speck. Yes, comets like Lulin do happen virtually every year. But I called for a major comet in 2007, and we got two instead ... and one that could be seen in daylight. They were the brightest comets to be seen since Hale-Bopp in 1997 and Hyakutake in 1996.

The Nor'easter that struck New York City in March 2007 was based on the 1937 hurricane that flooded the Big Apple. It did flood many of New York's boroughs, the metro region, Long Island, etc. The photos show it all.

The flooding in the Midwest in 2007 and 2008 was the worst flooding since 1993. Both were called 500-year floods. The Midwest experienced THREE of them in 2008, all record-breakers. The Mississippi-Missouri system was not as adversely affected as in 1993, however.

Even some of the flops ... were they really such flops??? Big Brown was such a shoe-in (pardon the pun) that by the third race at the Belmont he couldn't have earned anyone any real money who bet on him ... unless he lost! History was almost made there, the first Triple Crown since 1978, the longest drought between Triple Crowns since Citation in 1948 and Secretariat in 1973. I can imagine how many people bored to death with the most successful racing horse in history, never defeated in any race by any horse until the Belmont, chuckled when he lost. These same people doubtlessly came on my site, rolling their eyes, thinking McClellan is going to get yet another one right. Damn him. Then came the report after Big Brown lost about a shoe seen dangling from his hoof, a shoe carelessly shod ... or purposely not put in place. Most serious horse race enthusiasts I know say the race was fixed ... because Big Brown was too good to be true. You can't win any money on a sure thing.

However, rather than hiccups, I do see some very spectacular failures. Like the failure of the Big One (or in the case of my prediction, "the Big Two") to strike LA, San Francisco, or even San Diego, Portland, or Seattle. Despite an impeccable series of base 7 alignments, not even so much as a rumble occurred. All the seismic action remains around Indonesia ... where it has been since December 2004. Then again, there is that phenomenon I have tried to explain that I call geological transmigration. Isn't it strange that on the very day I said the West Coast would be hammered, China had the worst earthquake in its history besides the great earthquake of 1976?

How could I fine tune a pattern of major West Coast quakes occurring at regular intervals in the past and have instead concluded that the Big One would hit China instead? Nevertheless, I will say this much: when the West Coast does go it will likely be linked in time to the 1906 quake or else the 1989 or 1994 quakes. Next time around for San Francisco (or adjacent regions) is October 2010.

But yes, you are right. A major event can end up being more of a minor event the next time around or 14 or 21 etc years later. Then after a procession of hiccups and very honorable mentions, along comes the nightmare version ... finally.

I now tell everyone that the base 7 system is infallible. It belongs to God, that's why. Seven is God's perfect number and is the reason you will see it and its multiples and even its fraction (42 months is half of seven years) all over the Bible.

The base 7 system by itself is 100% accurate. What is inaccurate is the person using the system. As a person using the base 7 system, I will NEVER be 100% accurate. Someone else might do better than I. A supercomputer may come damn close to 100%, but probably still fall short of 100%.

Aside from the events that fail to repeat this time around (but may do so next time around or the time after that), there are the events I never bothered to research. Ever notice those "Base 7 Alerts"? Those are from people who read a report of an event occurring and checked their history and found a link to another past event on the base 7 timeline. The wildfires in Australia are a good example of this. They tell me about it, and I find myself saying, why didn't I check into that a year or so ago? I didn't check into that because I would have to be God to check into everything possible under the sun.

So, sometimes I use base 7 to arrive at an event occuring again that happened in history, sometimes I take a well-known prophecy and attempt to date it using base 7, and sometimes I will attempt to date my dreams or popular conspiracy theories (not too often the latter) using base 7.

Yes, at this time, and since the 1990s, I have portrayed the nightmare version of any base 7 prediction or established prophecy as happening in our time. Why? Simply because, it is clear that the times we have been living in are sufficiently apocalyptic enough for the worst case scenarios to be presented. If we survive the 2012-13 period intact and without war, the base 7 patterns will no longer need to be presented as nightmare versions of past events.

Thanks again for your support,

Mike

Trabzon, Turkey in news

----- Original Message -----
From: Todd
To: mmcclellan@adelphia.net
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 10:36 PM
Subject: Trabzon, Turkey in news

I saw this and said "let me guess, Trabzon??" and I guessed right. This could contribute to the prediction that Russia / Iran will converge on and seige Trabzon...

http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/WTARC/2009/me_turkey0226_03_18.asp

Todd

*** * * * ***

Thanks very much for that, Todd.

I believe what most of the prophecies say will end up being true about Turkey: that Russia will try to conquer her in order to establish a southern flank. There are other reasons this could happen too: if Russia and Iran are indeed allies, and Turkey should become an obstacle for either country taking over Iraq or the oil fields of Arabia, also blocking Iran's path into the Balkans during the war of Daniel 7, 8, and early 11, one would expect to see prophecies about Russia driving southwards into Turkey and also Nostradamus' quatrains about Persia (Iran) at war with Byzantium (Turkey).

One thing that confuses me, however, is that Erna Stieglitz predicts that Russia will attack Iran also early in the war ... which goes against the grain of everything else we know about their special relationship and defence pact. Obviously, some of these prophets must have been a bit confused at what they saw. I could understand Iran double-crossing Russia after the Russian blitzkrieg on Europe is waged and then repelled, which I do believe will happen, and what is left of the Russian military attempting a major assault against Iranian forces. Meantime, Iranian-led Muslim forces will still be strong and continuing the advance against the West in southern Europe even though Russia will be driven back from central and northern Europe by the "yellow dust."

According to the many people who interpret the prophet Ezekiel, Turkey will be an ally of Russia (Gog) during the invasion of Israel. However, Ezekiel calls Gog "chief prince of Meschech and Tubal" (ancient kingdoms that were once part of Asia Minor, now Turkey). When one is a prince of a kingdom or territory, it is often territory that has been captured in war. Thus, Gog (Russia) has captured Turkey earlier on and made it one of his provinces. One should not gather because nations are named as allies of Gog that all of them are willing allies.

Anyway, I have a feeling that the attack by Russia on Israel, like the attack on Babylon (Iraq) by many nations at the conclusion of the war prophesied by Jeremiah, may both be post-World War III operations or end-of-world-war operations conducted under a governing world body. Jeremiah's prophecy about the great war in the Middle East ends with Iraq being destroyed utterly and Iran going into captivity as a Western colony. Perhaps "Chiren selin" and the new European Union/NWO will make a decision to punish Iraq and Iran once and for all and assemble a huge force much like Desert Storm was assembled in 1991. Included in the ensuing argument will be if Israel should be punished as well. According to Nostradamus, "those of Russia" at that point will be allied with "the king of Europe" who appears as a "gryphon."

So Russia will aid in the destruction of Babylon (Iraq). Jeremiah ends there, but I've feeling Ezekiel takes up where he leaves off. After a short period of time, Russia argues that Israel too must be punished. Either that, or Russia is is given the task to march on Israel, and Russia reluctantly agrees and assembles a great force for this purpose. Ezekiel does say Gog will have hooks put into his jaws and will be dragged into going to war with Israel. So the war of Gog may be the final operation by the new EU, new NWO in the Middle East following World War III ... a war Russia participates in with great reluctance.

Anyway, just a thought. Nevertheless, I suspect Turkey's destiny will be to become a conquered nation that will eventually become a province of a new Russian Empire.

Thanks again,

Mike

New Aircrash soon ?

----- Original Message -----
From: Michael Skøtt Andersen
To: Michael McClellan
Sent: Monday, March 02, 2009 5:35 PM
Subject: New Aircrash soon ?

Hello Mike

I hope that you and your family are feeling well.

Just two days after the miracle landing on the Hudson river in New York I had the following short dream:

It was in the evening or night and the sky was dark and it would seem cloudy, at least I didnt see any stars.

I was standing in a house or in the garden in front of a house close to the railway of the A-train line in Copenhagen. I have seen the houses in real life when I sometimes passes by in the A-train. The railway is situated on a rise in the terrain. Suddenly I saw a passenger jet with two engines diving steeply from the right of me and then across the railway, when the pilot managed to pull the jet out of the dive and allmost flying leveled verry close to the ground. While he was doing this he also turned the plane around so it now was travelling towards me, and allmost below the railway. For a moment I thought that the right wing of the plane was going to hit the house in which I was standing, and that it would cut me down, but instead the nose of the plane pitched up and at the same time the plane banked left.

I got at glimpse of the company name on the side of the jet. It was in blue text and said "KLM".

Apparently the jet was stalling and turned to the left with the nose pointing down. The jet crashed into the side of the rise where the railway is situated. There was no explosion but I knew that at least the pilots would be killed. Throug out this dream I didnt hear any sound from jet engines. The crash took place between the stations "Ellebjerg" and "Sjælør" or "Åmarken" and "Sjælør".

They can be found on Krak.dk or on GoogleEarth i guess, in case you would want a map of it.

After the Crash in Amsterdam of the Turkish airlines passenger jet I got a call from two of my sisters whom I had told this dream. Both of them said that it must have been what I had been dreaming of.

I must admit that there are some similarities between my dream and what took place in Holland.
1. The company name is written with blue letters.
2. The jet crashed without power/ The engines werent running.
3. There was no explosion.
4. The pilots were killed.
5. The nose of the jet pitched up shortly before the crash.
5. KLM is a Dutch company, and the crash happened in Holland.

Even so I am not convinced. I dont think that there is a railway just beside the crashsite in Holland. And my dream was about a plane crashing in Copenhagen.

I dont know if this was a plane taking of from Copenhagen International Airport Kastrup, or if it was arriving.

Friendly Greetings

Michael Skøtt Andersen / Copenhagen d'Annemarc

*** * * * ***

Hi Mike,

I'm sorry to say things have not been too good the last month ... although I did not post anything about that on my website. I got an attack of severe painful gout in my right foot and found it as hard to sit at the computer or any chair as it was to walk. I was in bed most of a week. Although the most severe symptoms have gone away, the foot remains chronically in pain and hard to walk on. Then last week I got food poisoning or intestinal flu, whatever it was I was in misery for three days and couldn't get out of bed for that either. My dad is still very sick, pain in his stomach, not much of an appetite, and has lost much weight ... he has another test tomorrow, so maybe this time we will finally find out what is wrong and what can be done.

So, the updates on my website have been sporadic at best, with, I think, an entire week when I did not update at all. I still have email going back to early February that I intended to answer and still needs to be answered. And there always remains the backlog of unanswered email going back, in some cases, to 2006.

Your dream should not be associated with the Turkish airliner crash in Holland for the obvious reason that it so clearly takes place in Denmark! You do not have a "vague sence" of such a crash: your dream is full of details, places, and names. I arrived at the Turkish airliner crashing (in March 2009, which was only four days off) using the base 7 system ... and the best I could come up with for a crash site was France or the UK. Those places are not too far from Netherlands though, I must admit. Holland, on the other hand, is much farther away from Denmark ... so your dream likely is an event yet to happen.

The best thing to do here is to do research to find out what years Denmark has experienced air crashes on its soil. There was such a crash on 09 September 2007 in Aaloborg. But that would not have any real resonance until 2014 obviously, if even then. Aside from that, I have before me the 100 worst aviation accidents in history ... and not one of them occurred in Denmark. So this is going to make dating your dream next to impossible, save for a potential September 2014 dating. I will be moving ahead as far as 2016 in the near term, so I might keep it in mind.

By 2016 the great monarch should be revealed and in power, leading Europe and the world into a new, unprecedented period of peace and prosperity, or else the beast will have taken away all hope of such a leader and brought about a final Armageddon. There are a few other options, both good and bad, that could also happen instead ... such as moving off the "jagged path" prophesied in the Hopi Indian Prophecy in Rock, postponing the evil time we are now in by 28 or more years before the current cycle concludes, bringing opportunity for fresh troubles in the late 2030s, or worse, bringing about our own extinction during the next few years.

It seems human beings have choices to make ... we can only hope they make the right ones!

Kind regards,

Mike

PS Thank you very much for your concern about my health and that of my family's and your financial support. It is much appreciated!

Anti-christ

----- Original Message -----
From: Debra
To: mmcclellan@roadrunner.com
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 4:58 PM
Subject: Anti-christ

Mike,

I was wondering what your thoughts are on Obama perhaps being the anti-christ. Now that all the pre-election hipe is gone, I have not heard much more about this. I am a pastor of a church and have studied Revelation, not to say I have any real knowledge of when or where the events will take place. However, during one of Obama's pre-election speeches, as I was listening, a cold chill ran up my spine. From that day on, I have not listened to his voice but rather read articles regarding what he has to say.

I know this sounds crazy, but his smooth way of talking makes me feel that he is truly the deceiver. Just wondering what you think.

Thank you in advance for your response.

Blessings,
Debra

* * * * *

Debra,

I think it may have been intended that Obama be the personification of the beast of Revelation 13, but I have also had the feeling that there is something about him that would reject this role, even though this would leave him open to possible assassination.

We have no choice but to wait and see.

However, I will leave you with this quote from another viewer who thinks he will not be the beast:

"I have also heard that Obama, while he could never have gotten elected without illuminati (term herewith used to include all the secret ops) support, is planning to buck the system. I heard it is his intention in his 8 years as President to create the tipping point which will neutralize illuminati control. That is purportedly why they attempted to assassinate him twice during the election campaign. Do you remember that airplane he was on that mysteriously lost altitude and then recovered? Some are saying that ETs intervened—and that we are getting a lot of off planet help..."

Well, whether he has had ET help as the viewer claims or not I do not know, but it is clear that other people sense that Obama may be his own man, a leader who will do "according to his will" rather than by the dictates of a beast system that would enslave the very people he swore long ago he would liberate.

Hopefully we will persevere through the current economic crisis and all be given another cycle of 28 years before we encounter evil times yet again.

Thanks for writing and God bless,

Mike

TO Kathryn Wolfe and Mike McClellan

----- Original Message -----
From: World Changer
To: mmcclellan@roadrunner.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 12:00 PM
Subject: TO Katy Wolfe and Mike McClellan

http://gospelgodspell.blogspot.com/

Yes, there is hope but you will not listen even to REAL Prophecies given to me by a full port kundalini rising and confirmed by others. You have been enslaved by the Jew memes which HAVE CREATED THE CONDITIONS FOR WAR AND GREAT DEPRESSION. PLEASE SEND ME THE WEB ADDRESS OF THE HOPI ELDERS AND I WILL PROVE IT TO YOU. THE QUESTION IS DO YOU REALLY SEEK HELP FOR THIS WORLD OR ONLY YOUR OWN FAME?

*** * * * ***

To WC.

For me this is not about fame or fortune or even material gains, all of which I have spent years avoiding, as mad as it sounds, since those things would actually hinder my purpose. No... Justice is what this is truly about. You keep bringing up about the Jews, believe me, I know more than I am willing to say about what is really going on in that area, just at this time. And anyway, you seem to have grasped a fundamental issue regarding their true intent. But there are more pressing decisions going on behind the things you seem to be concerned about right now.

You have taken only one side of an argument that has long been fought and rallied up against the Jews, believe me again, not many will take notice if you preach something no one wants to hear in reality.

What you appear to have missed though, is the war that some are engaged in at this time. Each battle must be carefully and intricately proceeded with. It is not to be joked about nor taken lightly.

I have skip read that blog you sent. With all due respect, I am taking a different approach to what could be considered the same argument you and others have rallied behind for many years(Since 1913). And yet you are not patient, but instead implement anger? I will add....some things we are not saying at this time and will choose wisely when to say them.

I know full well the effects of magic and spells, and yes the world is being horribly misled. But if you understand the power of 'energy' and how to use it correctly, you become aware of how much IS actually an illusion. Don't think for one minute I am not familiar on such matters, because most of the people around me use this power on a daily basis.

As in respect with Mike. He has passed up on many various opportunities to do countless radio and TV interviews, due to the fact he also does not seek fame. But you have to understand one inevitable thing about the truth. If it is to be told by any one person, it is a sad fact that person will unfortunately have no say in how famous they then become. It is part of the package in revealing the truth.

I plan to say more on Mike's web pages. So please just bear with us and trust that we have the knowledge about the timing. It is a fine line now the human race walks between good and evil. I only hope that good will prevail. Good luck in your quest.

Kathryn

Victoria Bushfires repeated after 70 years.

----- Original Message -----
From: Louis
To: mmcclellan@roadrunner.com
Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2009 11:20 PM
Subject: Victoria Bushfires repeated after 70 years.

Hi Mike

How are you going?

I would like to let you know: As you no doubt have heard by now, Australia is suffering the worst bushfire tragedy in the state of Victoria, after we have gone through the hottest day on record (46.4 degrees (117 degrees I believe)!) on Saturday.

I was actually expected something really bad this year because it has been exactly 70 years since Black Friday Bushfires in 1939 where about 70 people have perished (the last bushfire of this magnitude was Ash Wednesday in 1983 where about 40 people also perished). Not certainly to the extent where towns were wiped out and deaths reaching 128 so far and it is not even over. We are still in shock of it.

To add to the tragedy, one of Australia's most respected and loved newsreaders, Brian Naylor died along with his wife. (http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,25026070-661,00.html) He has been living in one of the devastated areas, Kingslake.

Now I learnt that the figures of death toll could double to 230! I just hope it isn't the case. However having witnessed the bushfires' aftermath I can say it is very possible…

Take Care

Louie

* * * * *

Hi Louie,

Thanks for the red alert! I also discovered when researching the Black Friday Fires that there had been major fires in Tasmania (Black Tuesday fires) in February 1967 ... which is also on the timeline! (1939 + 28 = 1967 + 42 = 2009)

You can see your comments below and my comparisons of the Victoria Fires with both Black Friday fires and the Tasmanian Fires in a Red Alert on http://www.newprophecy.net/2009part4.htm

The base 7 principal is ALWAYS at work, irregardless if anyone anticipates an event using the system or not.

Take care and thanks again,

Mike

----- Original Message -----
From: Louis
To: Mike
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 12:05 AM
Subject: RE: Victoria Bushfires repeated after 70 years.

Hey Mike

no worries. Always glad to be of help.

Indeed the base 7 principal always works. It will happen again in the future regardless as you said. just a matter of when.

I had totally forgot the Tasmanian fires. Really that is amazing.

I never thought this tragedy of such huge proportions would happen here in Australia… least of all right near my home.
One thing I realised: This happened after almost 7 years after the bali bombings tragedy. Although I am sure it is not totally related but you cant help but think it's just a coincidence although I don’t believe in coincidences. But the timeline is a bit off I would guess?

Have a great weekend Mike

Quick question about "Selin"

----- Original Message -----
From: Marko
To: mmcclellan@roadrunner.com
Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2009 5:42 PM
Subject: Quick question about "Selin"

Howdy,

I just stumbled across your website the other day, and on the home page, at the top, you make reference to a person mention by Nostradamus named "...Selin (which is a reference to Selena..."

I wonder if you have heard of Javier Solana, whose name is very similar to Selin and Selena. He is, according to his wikipedia entry, "the High Representative for the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) and the Secretary-General of both the Council of the European Union (EU) and the Western European Union (WEU). He was named Secretary General of the 10 permanent member Western European Union in November 1999."

You will see his name in many current news stories, as he involves himself with various security and peace initiatives that involve Europe or the EU.

Even more interesting is the information I recently ran across about how his position came about. Did you know that his name is twice associated with the number 666? I know, I know, everyone and their cousin loves to use that number to try and figure out who The Antichrist is. But this is the first time in my adult life (I'm almost 50, and I've been studying Biblical prophecy since I was a teen) that I really think there are grounds for watching Solana (or anyone else who subsequently occupies his office). The research into Solana and 666 can be found here:

http://www.fulfilledprophecy.com/page/overview/

This is the best prophecy website from a Biblical viewpoint that I have yet found.

I find other, "extra-Biblical" prophecies quite interesting as well, which is how I found your website.

Just thought you might be interested in the above article on Solana.

*** * * * ***

Hello Marko,

The name "Solana" does indeed sound like "Selena," however, be aware that Nostradamus is not using the word "Selena" as an anagram or name. Rather, he is using "Selin" as a rather complex symbol and anagram. It refers us to Selena, the moon goddess, but it also refers us to Selim, a name taken by several Muslim leaders during the latter Crusades, during Nostradamus' life, and for a time after. The idea there was to associate Selena the moon goddess with the crescent moon symbol used by Muslim nations such as Algeria, the home of the Barbary pirates, and also especially the Turks. In Nostradamus' time Turkey was to the West what Iran is to the West today. All the more amazing that Nostradamus foresaw Persia (Iran) as a major antagonist of the West in his quatrains and not Byzantium (Turkey), clearly skipping ahead five centuries to our time.

In any event, with this background on Selena, I think you can see that Solana sounding like Selena is not only a coincidence, but actually irrelevant. If Solana sounded or looked similar to Selin, that would be the ticket.

The idea, then, is to find a name that sounds like "Selin" or else a name or word that has the same meaning as Selena, that is, it is associated with the moon. Of course, the word "moon" itself will do just nicely.

My own view of "Selin" being "Moon" (as in Reverend Sun Myung Moon or one of his sons) or, more likely, UN Secretary-General Ban Ki Moon can be understood in this light. If Ban Ki Moon pulls off something dramatic this year, such as stopping a terrible war that would otherwise turn into a global conflict, he will earn the right to have his name right up there with Chyren/Chiren, providing he is still UN Secretary General when this Chyren/Chiren is revealed and comes to power.

More likely, however, is that the Selin figure will be a Muslim (perhaps the messianic al-Mahdi of Islam or the ruthless pro-Western Sufyanni, the "great Arab" installed by the West? possibly both will fulfill Selin some way, first the one, then the other?) or else will simply stand for the Muslim crescent moon symbol (Selim + Selena = Muslim moon). Thus, "Chiren selin" could mean an alliance between the future "Christian" King of Europe and the Sufyaani or the future Christian King of Europe and the al-Mahdi. OR, it could mean Chiren/Chyren will conquer the warring Muslim nations and then pacify their peoples and bring peace upon them and peace upon Europe.

It is all very complex and I doubt we will know for certain in which way or ways "Selin" will achieve fulfillment. It may be fulfilled a number of ways.

I have heard about Javier Solana indeed. When the war in Bosnia was raging in 1994 and 1995, he was highly visible on CNN cable TV news as the Secretary General of Nato. I must tell you though, when I saw him at that time, I sensed nothing in the least bit sinister or evil about the man. Indeed, he seemed rather unassuming, polite, quiet, soft-spoken, pragmatic, and with an average sense of humour. The man is throughly unremarkable in my opinion.

Yes, maybe 666 can be connected with his name. So can Ronald Reagan, Henry Kissinger, Sun Myung Moon, anyone named Fox, and virtually everyone with the last name of Windsor. For that matter, so can my name as well. But I can assure you I have no desire to rule the world nor is it ever likely to happen.

But we will watch Mr Solana all the same. People do change and perhaps he has ambitions we are not aware of??

Nostradamus, I believe, does name him in one quatrain. Here it is:

Nostradamus, Quatrain 10.62 ~

Near Sorbia [E. Germany] for to assail Hungary, the diplomat of Bude [Budapest] will come to warn them.
The Byzantine chief, Salona of Slavonia, will come to convert to the law of the Arabs.

Slavonia once belonged to the Balkan nation of Serbia and was often a battleground between the Croats and Serbs both in the Serbo-Croat War of 1991 and again during the conflict in Bosnia (which pitted the Serbs against the Croats as well as Croats and Serbs against Bosniaks). Eventually, during the final year of the Bosnian war in 1995, it became a part of eastern Croatia.

I have to admit that Salona and Solana are remarkably similar. Perhaps by calling him a "Byzantine" chief, Nostradamus is saying Solana, again in a senior military command role in Nato or the Eu, will direct the Western forces fighting the Russians and the non-Arab Muslims (Iranians, Shi'a-governed Iraqis, Shi'a Kurds, Turkish Kurds, eastern Turks, Sharia Afghans, Azeris, Turkomens, Uzbeks, Kazahks, Pakistanis, Muslim Kashmiris, Muslim Indians, etc) in the Central/East European Theatre and the Levant. To Nostradamus, "Byzantine" could mean more than merely Turkey, it could also mean the rest of the Balkans (including the former Yugoslavia), Romania, Hungary, Transdniester, Moldova, southern Ukraine, etc, and even Syria, Lebanon, Israel, and Palestine (which were colonised by the Byzantine knights and where ruins of castles can still be found). It takes a discerning eye to know when "Byzantine" is intended to mean Turkey and when it is intended to mean the nations of Europe and southwest Asia that once comprised the Byzantine Empire.

In our own time, it is clear that this is a Christian (or "Christian") commander in the Balkans because the final line says he will "come to convert to the law of the Arabs." My guess is that he will convert to the Sunni brand of Islam because the broader implication is that the Arabs, possibly under a coming, super Sunni Arab (the Sufyaani), will be allied with the West against the non-Arab Shi'a and Sharia Muslims led by Iran and Afghanistan.

In other quatrains we are told that Croatia, Bosnia, and Serbia will become a battleground yet again, and that Arab blood will be spilled in the Adriatic Sea. Yet it is "barbarians" that take control of Dalmatia. I suspect the Arabs, actually often placed in a good light if you really look, are pitted against the "barbarians" ... and these are the Shi'a and Sharia peoples of the eastern Middle East, Central Asia, and Southern Asia, led by the Persians (Iran). Thus, Western forces under Javier Solana will team up with the Arabs to re-take the Balkans (making Javier Solana "Solana of Slavonia").

So, when fighting is in the Hungarian theatre, and Nostradamus talks about this in one of his "Castor and Pollux" quatrains that appears to pit the US against Russia in Hungary, Vojvodina (northern Serbia), and Ukraine, Javier Solana will lead his European-Arab force from the Balkans into the region. Either that or this is a re-taking of Hungary, with Arab help, after the Russians have been defeated.

Anyway, that's my take on a very convoluted quatrain that seems to be about Javier Solana.

Thanks for bringing up such an interesting, albeit complex, subject.

Warm regards,

Mike

December 12th 2012

----- Original Message -----
From: Ross
To: mmcclellan@roadrunner.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 9:00 PM
Subject: December 12th 2012

Hi Mike,

I just wondered what your thoughts are on the Mayan prophecy of December 12th 2012 also did Nostradamus say anything about this time ?

All I can find out is that the earth will be in the centre of the universe...all the plants will be inline and the " cycle " will be complete.

Have you thought about making a page on the Mayan Prophecy or can you give me more information ?

I have read that Nostradamus, Edgar Casey, and Mother Shipton all point to the date as being a major change for humanity or even the end of the earth.

Also another intresting fact that I read somewhere was that the Mayan tribes Aztec Calendar that supposedly highly accurate and prophetic was written in the year 3797bc, I dont know if this is true but I do know that Nostradamus named the year 3797 in his prophecies.

Anyway I just wondered what your thoughts are on the subject and if you would share them with me.

Many Thanks,

Ross.

*** * * * ***

Hi Ross,

All I know about the Mayan calendar "end date" of December 21, 2012 is that it is alleged by modern Internet/media doomsayers to mark the end of time, the end of human history, etc. In fact it marks only the end of a cycle. What these people fail to tell you is that on December 22, 2012 the calendar continues and a new cycle begins.

Are the planets all aligned at that time? I don't know, haven't done the research ... the Mayan perspective seems to be rather unique anyway since no other civilisation or religion warns or has warned about the significance of 2012.

Edgar Cayce may have warned about 2012 in his writings, I don't know. I have never read them all since they are quite extensive and certainly not all concern themselves with prophecy. However, what I do recall Cayce warning about was that earth changes would reach a horrifying crescendo in 1998-2000 and that 2001 would see the earth shifting its axis ... and if it did not do so in 2001, that "a new cycle will begin." How long would the "new cycle" be? He doesn't say.

Nostradamus and Mother Shipton say absolutely nothing about 2012 as far as I know.

I don't know about the Mayan's calendar beginning in the year 3797 BC. Never heard of that one. But Nostradamus did say the physical destruction of our planet would occur in 3797 AD.

I get the feeling right there that some people are taking bits and pieces of other prophecies, like Nostradamus' 3797 AD prophecy above, and trying to attach them in some way to the whole Mayan thing.

The only other thing I have heard about the Mayan year 2012 is that mankind's machines, appliances, etc are supposed to rise up against us, attacking us and rebuking us for all our wrong-doings. Or maybe that is another Central/South American indian prophecy.

No, there is not enough material to justify a "Mayan Prophecy" page that I can see.

Even so, I will have two series of 2012 pages up in the near future (and 2011, 2013, 2014, 2015, and 2016 too).

Sorry if I sound less than enthusiastic about the Mayan calendar prophecy. Actually, in a way, they will be right I suppose: according to the base 7 system, 2012 will be a very horrible year if we manage to survive 2009.

Take care,

Mike

Sincerely Concerned

----- Original Message -----
From: T
To: mmcclellan@roadrunner.com
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 3:29 PM
Subject: Sincerely Concerned

I am very concerned because your site is something my good friend is reading every day and is very scared and upset about. He is panicking daily worrying about a prediction coming true. Every day he runs as far away from this city as he can and then comes back and does it all over again the next day. I know that you have the best intentions but how can I or you assure him that there is reason to panic and run every day? I really need your advice on this because he is very scared and so am I -- for him.

Thanks so much.

*** * * * ***

Dear T,

There are very good reasons why he should not panic.

For one thing, not everything that is predicted will come true. Whilst I may have been right about the stock market, the invasion of Georgia by Russia, look at Hillary Clinton: predictions, such as mine, that she would win the presidency failed, and some very major figures in prediction (such as John Hogue) were also absolutely certain she would. What is more there was established prophecy, such as the tenth prophecy of William Branham (with the first nine prophecies successfully fulfilled since they were made in 1933), that indicated a woman would win the election and be supported by the women's vote. Not only did Hillary fail to win, but even Sarah Palin failed to win the vice presidency.

The future can be changed. That is the point of my website being there. It is not to say "Look at all the horrible things that will happen and there is absolutely nothing we can do about it," but rather, "look what might happen if we or our leaders are careless and nothing is done to change it."

Aside from collective and individual responsibility for what happens in the future, however, there are times things just do not happen because the time is simply not right.

I hope you understand the subtle difference between predictions and prophecies. Anyone can predict the future using various kinds of systems, such as astrology or numerology. Prophecy, on the other hand, is allegedly divine revelation of the future by God or some other deity, angel, supernatural figure, etc. I make predictions calculated by close examination of how God's perfect number, 7, has been involved in past events recurring at intervals of 7 years or multiples of 7 years ( such as 14, 21, 28, 35 etc). What I project is a likelihood of an event occurring at a certain time as opposed to a prophecy of an event that will happen for certain some day. Sometimes, however, I will see cases where a prophecy could support my prediction and will make mention of it. That still doesn't mean I will be right.

In any event, the following is true about the future:

1) The future is not fixed

2) Most predictions of events made using a system can be changed or prevented from happening, some events will fail to occur at all if the timing is wrong, many events that do happen can be mitigated

3) The strongest prophecies, such as Bible prophecies, are not even dated ... thus we are always guessing or estimating when they will be fulfilled based on other clues

4) The strongest prophecies, such as those in the Book of Revelation, will happen some day ... but the outcome of those events that are prophesied can be changed or mitigated

I will leave you with a famous quote from a book which I often use to illustrate the truth about future events:

The nineteenth century novelist Charles Dickens seeks to assure his readers that the future is not set in stone, literally, in A Christmas Carol when the central character Ebenezer Scrooge is shown his very own headstone by the Ghost of Christmas Future and queries in great dread and trepidation: 'Are these the shadows of the things that Will be, or are they shadows of things that May be, only? ... Men's courses will foreshadow certain ends, to which, if persevered in, they must lead. But if the courses be departed from, the ends will change. Say it is thus with what you show me!'

Scrooge gets his answer when the spectre beckons again and Scrooge finds himself alive and well in his bedchamber ... with many years of a good and happier life still remaining to him.

Mike

Promised Warrior?

----- Original Message -----
From: David
To: mmcclellan@roadrunner.com
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 1:21 PM
Subject: Promised Warrior?

Mike

Here's a relevant prophecy from sources most Christians would ignore. However, in my search for the truth I look at all sources good or bad, because there is bad in the good and good in the bad. So consider the following:

When Barack Hussein Obama (Barry Soetoro) went to mosques he sited the prayer in Arabic, Allah is repeated many times in the ritual.

Is Barack Obama the "promised warrior" coming to help the Hidden Imam of Shiite Muslims conquer the world?

The question has made the rounds in Iran since last month, when a pro-government Web site published a Hadith (or tradition) from a Shiite text of the 17th century. The tradition comes from Bahar al-Anvar (meaning Oceans of Light) by Mullah Majlisi, a magnum opus in 132 volumes and the basis of modern Shiite Islam.

According to the tradition, Imam Ali Ibn Abi-Talib (the prophet's cousin and son-in-law) prophesied that at the End of Times and just before the return of the Mahdi, the Ultimate Saviour, a "tall black man will assume the reins of government in the West." Commanding "the strongest army on earth," the new ruler in the West will carry "a clear sign" from the third imam, whose name was Hussein Ibn Ali. The tradition concludes: "Shiites should have no doubt that he is with us."

In a curious coincidence Obama's first and second names--Barack Hussein--mean "the blessing of Hussein" in Arabic and Persian. His family name, Obama, written in the Persian alphabet, reads O Ba Ma, which means "he is with us," the magic formula in Majlisi's tradition.

Following are some of the attributes of the 12th Imam Mahdi (= Antichrist?) according to their own Islamic sources. Christians should note that the resemblance to the Antichrist is striking to say the least:

1. He will appear suddenly near the end of time in Mecca.

2. He will be descended from Mohammed.

3. He will stutter.

4. He will shine like an Israelite.

5. He will unite and reform the Muslims.

6. He will have a mole on his left or right cheek.

7. His eyebrows will mix.

8. He will rule Islam from Jerusalem for 7 years. Note that according to Scripture, Antichrist rules the world from Jerusalem for seven years.

9. He will have hundreds of close companions including Elijah, Elisha, the Seven Sleepers, and al-Khidr.

10. His coming will be announced by earthquakes, sea storms, and a fire over the sky of Basra.

11. He will be a fanatical Muslim.

12. Mahdi the archaeologist: He is called the guided one because he will be guided to the place of the Ark. He will find the Ark of the Covenant. A group of Jews and Christians will come to debate him. Just as they declare victory, he will produce a copy of the real Bible from the Ark. The Jews and Christians will then admit that Islam was right all long and convert. Some will refuse and be subsequently beheaded. Note that beheading is Antichrist's preferred method of execution according to Revelation.

13. A mountain of gold will be discovered under the Euphrates.

14. The people of Iraq will help him.

15. The world will love him. Note that the world will marvel after Antichrist.

16. He will have a gap between his tooth.

17. He will receive guidance and knowledge from Allah.

18. He will be helped by Jesus. Note that Antichrist will be helped by the Beast. Despite the fact that Jesus is a messenger of Allah and Mahdi is only a caliph of Allah, Jesus will pray behind Mahdi.

19. He will be charismatic, young, and very handsome. Half the women of Rome will convert to Islam in the hope of joining his harem. But Antichrist lacks the desire of women.

20. He will fill the world with peace and justice.

21. A great army will march against him in Syria. However, the earth will open up and swallow this army. Scripture calls Antichrist the Assyrian.

22. He will receive aid from the East. Mohammed reportedly said, "Many armies will come after me. You must join the one from Khorasan. That is the army of the caliph."

23. Mahdi must battle Gog, Magog, and Dajjal; the Islamic Antichrist.

24. He will be beardless.

25. He will be rich and will give wealth to the people of the world freely. He will cause crops to grow. Antichrist and Beast will have great power on earth.

26. His personality will be similar to Mohammed's.

Sincerely
David

*** * * * ***

Dear David,

It is far from certain that Barack Obama is or ever was a Muslim:

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/front/6084678.html

excerpt from:

UT poll shows McCain, Cornyn with comfortable margins

Poll finds 23% of Texans think Obama is Muslim

Obama is a Christian who was embroiled in a controversy earlier this year about his two-decade membership in Chicago's Trinity United Church of Christ. Yet just 45 percent of those polled identified the Illinois senator as a Protestant.

The Obama-is-a-Muslim confusion is caused by fallacious Internet rumors and radio talk-show gossip. McCain went so far at one of his town hall meetings to grab a microphone from a woman who claimed that Obama was an Arab.

The Texas numbers are unusual because most national polls show that just 5 to 10 percent of Americans still believe Obama is a Muslim — less than half the number of Texans who buy into the debunked theories ...

It is possible that Barack Obama may be the "tall black man (who) will assume the reins of government in the West" commanding "the strongest army on earth" ... but at least some of the rest is unlikely.

... Not unless Obama makes a special peace with the Muslim world and brings about a rapprochement with Iran. He could, after all, be a good friend to the Muslim world without actually being a Muslim himself.

Before I discuss the personification of the beast/Antichrist aspect of this allow me to remind you what I think you probably may agree to be true: for endtime prophecy to be fulfilled all the right conditions must be met. Not one detail can fail to occur. It is for this reason we have witnessed a string of major national leaders or world leaders over the centuries that have fit the role of the beast, yet have failed to fulfill the destiny of the personification as prophesied in the Book of Revelation and in the Book of Daniel.

Every generation the powers that be attempt to promote a candidate, a man, who will fulfill this role. As we have seen history demonstrate, sometimes these candidates work against the interests of TPTB and are killed. President John F. Kennedy was a good example of this. When he gave a speech about the existence of secret societies and how his administration would not tolerate the existence of such societies or their secret proceedings, he was sending a message to TPTB that he would not follow their dictates or grand designs but rule according to his own will, by the letter of the law, and with the nation's best interests at heart, first and foremost. Because of this he was assassinated.

Past would-be antichrists like Hitler could not succeed in fulfilling the destiny of the beast because the other players, such as the false prophet, were not in place. Not all the chesspieces were available for the match, in other words.

The Book of Revelation, like the pertaining chapters in the Book of Daniel, is like a recipe book: it has to be fulfilled detail by detail from Revelation 1 all the way to Revelation 13 (the chapter in which the beast appears). During the last 2000 years there have been several notable close calls for "the great earthquake" that follows the opening of the sixth seal. For example the eruptions of Vesuvius, Krakatau, Tambora, Pelee and the asteroid explosion at Tunguska came close to fulfilling this prophecy because of the widespread tsunamis, tidal waves, firestorms, strong winds, strange atmospheric effects, and climate changes, yet all of these still fell considerably short. Also, all events and personifications that follow from Revelation 14 through Revelation 18 and in the Book of Daniel must occur.

When someone appears to fufill a personality out of endtime prophecy, but not all the other conditions are being met, we call this person an archetype. Antiochus Epiphanes was the earliest archetype for the beast/Antichrist because he lived at the wrong time: he lived and died long before Christ was even born and not during the latter days or time of the end. Napoleon and Hitler were archetypes because other conditions in the Books of Revelation and Daniel were not met. When JFK became president he met certain requirements. The famous actress Marilyn Monroe also may have been the first real attempt to create a personification of the whore of Babylon. Yet, no personification for the false prophet existed. Perhaps there was a search for such a personality in progress. If one was found, we will never know. Monroe and Kennedy became expendable and were both assassinated because they rebelled against TPTB and threatened to expose them.

Nevertheless, Marilyn Monroe and John F Kennedy were archetypes for the whore of Babylon in Revelation 17 and the beast of Revelation 13. Had these two followed their programming, Monroe might have married into the Kennedy family via Bobby Kennedy and become political. As a future first lady, she could have become the "queen of Babylon" of Revelation 18, combining the roles of both the WOB and QOB.

Today Madonna is the archetype for the whore of Babylon, or to be more specfic, the "woman" and "mother of harlots" who appears in Revelation 17. It would appear that the "queen of Babylon" who appears in Revelation 18 is a different personality, possibly Sarah Palin in some capacity.

(UPDATE NOTE, 1-21-09: Hillary Clinton once again will qualify as the QOB of Revelation 18 in the role of US Secretary of State along with her reputation as former Senator of New York - MM)

And now we have Barack Obama, a potential fulfillment of the beast.

There is no question that he and Hillary Clinton were called before the Bildenberg Group who make up a part of TPTB (or NWO). They have made their decision and Obama is their choice.

However, I believe that Obama, like John F Kennedy, is made of nobler stuff and will choose his own path, endangering his life in the process. He, like Madonna, will likely never fulfill bible endtime prophecy. They will be archetypes instead.

It is even possible TPTB cut a deal and made him the next Reagan. The first big hint TPTB were looking 30 years ahead for a possible fulfillment of endtime prophecy was when they named the asteroid that will almost certainly strike earth in April 2036 Apophis ("Destroyer").

This time around, instead of ending the Cold War between the Soviet Union and the United States as Reagan did, Obama will end the horrible relations between the United States and the Muslim world. I agree with that.

Now comparing Christian endtime prophecy with Muslim endtime prophecy is an inexact science. There are similarities, yet there are glaring differences.

To me the most brutal political figure in Muslim endtime prophecy is the Sufyaani (the final one). His cruelty and inhuman acts stand out like no other. We are told in one hadith that he has the support of the West. As leader of Syria and Sham he would be well-placed regionally to implement a peace with Israel, crushing all opposition and all enemies of Israel and his Western benefactors ruthlessly. In a word he would be perfect in the role of the beast/Antichrist.

The Dajjal, interestingly enough, sounds much more like the Christian version of the false prophet than he does the beast/Antichrist. He performs miracles and feats of magic. The beast is a political animal with heretical religious beliefs who ultimately comes to believe he is a god. The false prophet, on the other hand, supports the policies of the beast and enforces his reign through supernatural deeds (such as calling down fire from the sky and making statues walk and speak). Note that the Dajjal likewise "makes a fire of a garden and a garden of fire." He is surrounded by a strange people we might call "new age." On the other hand he is one-eyed and wooly-haired like certain archetypes and prophecies of the beast.

Thus, both characters seem to appear in the personage of Dajjal. However, the overwhelming similarities are to the false prophet.

Who then is the Mahdi? Nothing less than an Islamic messiah and the enemy of the beast (Sufyaani) and false prophet (Dajjal). In Islamic prophecy, the Dajjal outlives the Sufyaani. In Christian prophecy, the beast and false prophet are both destroyed nearly simultaneously by being cast alive by angels into the Lake of Fire (or Second Death as it is also called).

I believe the Mahdi appears in Christian prophecy in the Book of Daniel as the final "king of the south" (Arabia) who will war with the Antichrist at the time of the end. Since he is also leader of those of the black banners of Khurasan (Afghanistan, Tajikistan, Iran, Uzbekistan, and Turkmenistan), by default he also becomes the greatest of the Eastern kings in the Book of Revelation who rush to defeat Antichrist in the Battle of Armageddon. He may have as many as 200 million men under him during this final battle.

But as I say, there are discrepancies and disagreements about such comparisons. The big problem is one of timing.

But prophecy is always a case of seeing the future through a glass darkly. What we see at best is a facsimile of what will actually happen. So I am more pleasantly surprised by the similarities between Christian and Muslim endtime prophecy than I am put off by the differences.

Finally, if Barack Obama should merely be yet another Western archetype for the beast/Antichrist (as I suspect he will be), we are given a good idea by Nostradamus, Johannes Trithemius, and the Hebrew calendar when the beast and false prophet will finally appear: not until either seven years or 42 months before the year 2240, 2242, or 2243.

Still, I keep both a long view and a short view ... because God may decide to bring events to their ultimate conclusion sooner rather than later. One never knows.

Mike

Missed Predictions

----- Original Message -----
From: V
To: mmcclellan@roadrunner.com
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2008 9:37 PM
Subject: Missed Predictions

Hello Mike,

I have been following your web site for quite some time now. I have noticed that sometimes some of your predictions come true, but somewhere else or in some other form. For example; you said that a US rescue mission would fail this year, ( I can only assume its because of the base 7 of the Iranian hostage rescue attempt ) and as of now, that has yet to happen, but in that same month of this year there was the US hostage rescue of the FARC prisoners and I am wondering why you haven't made that a "prediction partially fulfilled" or whatnot.

I have seen it before too. Your prediction of massive riots against the US in Egypt for Jan '08 did not come true, but that same month there were massive protests in South Korea against the US.

Another miss-diction was when you predicted that Iran would test-fire a nuke, which didn't happen, but North Korea tested their nuke exactly when you said Iran would.

Basically what I'm getting at is, would you consider these to be fulfilled prophecies? How can you pinpoint exactly where an event will take place? Also I'd like to ask a unrelated question. What is your opinion on the likely hood of WW3 happening in '09? And what will the post-WW3 world be like?

Thanks, and get well soon,

-V

*** * * * ***

Hi V,

Thanks for bringing up this "misdirected prediction" situation as it is both a frustrating experience for me to see, for example (and as you point out) North Korea conducting a nuclear test the same month and year I said Iran would, and a fascinating bit of evidence that, nevertheless, in slightly different ways the base 7 trend or patterning continues to play out. I wish everyone had your powers of observation because, if they did, they would understand just how powerful a phenomenon base 7 actually is and why it is so very reliable a bellweather for establishing future outcomes of long-standing trends. Technically-speaking the base 7 system is virtually 100% correct nearly all the time ... rather, it is I, the one using the system, who is making miscalculations in using the knowledge I possess. I would imagine a super-computer would do a much better job than I using the base 7 system!

Nevertheless, it would also be a good thing to realise that it is possible for humans and other entities to intervene in this clockwork prophecy puzzle and gum up the works! Take the Big Brown prediction: everyone who knows anything about horse racing KNOWS that Big Brown should have won the Triple Crown this year. He did enter the Derby undefeated with more races to his credit than any other previous horse since 1913. It was destined that he win and I was right to predict that whoever the horse was who would win the Kentucky Derby in 2008 would go on to be the winner at the Preakness and the Belmont. Something went wrong, and it was not my calculation that went wrong either. There are still lingering reports that Big Brown had not been properly outfitted with a shoe on one of its hooves before the race and that it came off, causing the animal great pain and obviously great injury if the jockey had insisted on pushing for a win. Anyone who knows about horse racing will tell you that race was fixed, but no one wants to say so publicly.

One reason for tampering with this horse was its "undefeated" record. Because Big Brown was a "sure thing" no one could make any real money on the race. He was too good to be true. Unless there is risk, there is little money to be won. The field offered nothing other than losers (including the horse that won had Big Brown not been tampered with). Someone with a lot of money had Big Brown shod carelessly so he or she could make a killing betting against him. There were a number of bets placed against Big Brown that actually made no sense under the circumstances ... unless the betters knew something.

So here is a good example of how human intervention can change the outcome of an otherwise faultless prediction.

Thanks for telling me about the FARC mission. I was not aware of it at the time ... and I know why. In late February after a night of drinking brandy, I awoke the next day suffering from extreme vertigo. I thought perhaps it was the alcohol that caused it ( I do not drink to excess very often and, for that matter, not moderately that often either being more of a coffee hound). The vertigo would not go away, not even after five days. It was horrible and it was especially bad lying my head on the pillow, then the entire room spun around for what seemed 30 seconds making me think I would die. I was put on an anti-vertigo med that made me very sleepy .. which is bad because I have sleep apnea besides and that can cause a bit of narcolepsy. On March 5 I went out to eat. Driving home my blood pressure must have dropped really low and I passed out at the wheel. I awoke 15 seconds later, smashing into a stop sign, a guardrail, and then plummeted off a small cliff into a deep ditch of water. I was unhurt, but the car was totalled. I spent three days in hospital for examination. Not much was actually resolved by my being there. Finally, in late April, I went to a specialist who cured me of the vertigo. There are exercises I can now perform she taught me so if it ever comes back I will likely prevent a bad case of it again. The apnea is not yet resolved because I am on the wrong machine and need a new sleep study, but the narcolepsy seems to happen much less often now, thank goodness.

So, I was not very much "on the ball" about everything that was happening in the news back in the late winter and spring I am afraid, thus missed this FARC mission. You are correct: that would be a PREDICTION PARTIALLY FULFILLED or else CLOSE ... I need to familiarise myself with the details to determine which.

Regarding what happened in South Korea instead of Egypt, again, for personal reasons I will not get into in the latter part of the month, I was a bit out of the loop where events were concerned. Also I was trying to catch the web site up to 2008 as it was a new year.

Even so, what happened in South Korea, instead of Egypt, is a mechanism I do not entirely understand. It is why there was a major airliner crash in Spain rather than in the Middle East and another in Russia rather than the United States ... at the times base 7 alterted or predicted.

There appears to be a migratory nature to some base 7 patterns which I have sometimes called "translocation." It is rare for accidents to occur in the same location twice until at least a good 21 or 28 years have passed (sometimes much less and sometimes much more). Often we will see a grand return after 70 years: Jean Harlow (1937) = Anna Nicole Smith (2007); hurricane strikes Long Island causing major flooding (1937) = Nor' Easter striking New York City and causing major flooding (2007); and other instances. Even longer periods do we have to wait sometimes, like the dread 98th anniversary: Lincoln assassinated in 1865 = Kennedy assassinated in 1963.

Anyway, getting an accident right is a bit hit and miss because of the migratory nature of accidents. Nevertheless, one stands a good 50/50 or 75/25 chance of getting a repeat using the base 7 system.

Translocation (or migration of location in a trend) happens a little less frequently when dealing with war or warlike events, political events, and such. Take World War II and the Pacific migration. The US was at war with North Korea in 1950 and again with North Vietnam in 1964 after the Gulf of Tonkin attack. Although the US war dates with Japan during World War II do not fit the Korea-Vietnam timeline, it established the Pacific as the arena of conflict for some time to come. In 1971 Vietnam not only did not go away, but spread to Cambodia, Laos, and Thailand. By 1978 Cambodia was the new "killing fields" .. but without US participation.

However, by 1985 the Pacific had ceased to be the arena of conflict. The trend was undergoing migration. Had anyone used the base 7 system during the early 1980s, they would have either made the mistake of predicting yet another Pacific conflict in 1985 or else, noting a migration of concern towards the Persian Gulf in 1980, might have predicted a major US war with Iran or Iraq in 1985. Again, that person would have been wrong about the dating at least since the US did not enter the Iran-Iraq War until 1987. One can easily understand the migration from the Far East to the Middle East, but why the start of conflict would be gummed up by two years is not easy to explain. Perhaps this was due to mass paranoia at that time that 1985 would be the start of World War III or because of the new developments in the relationship between the Soviet Union and the United States. Human concern delayed the war by two years, until an allegedly errant Iraqi Exocet missile changed all that in May 1987.

Now more confident, our imaginary base 7 calculator would have either seen the two year switch as a gum-up and stuck to the timeline which would next occur in 1992 or else would have planned to assert a new timeline in 1994. He/she would have called a major Middle East war in 1992 and been shocked to see Operation Desert Storm occur in 1991 .. a year early. Of course this fell short of World War III, but encouraged on by cheers of approval and awe our persistent base 7 technician would be all ready to bet the farm on 1999, which would have yielded disastrous results.

Another migration had occurred in the meantime from the Middle East to the Balkans (in Slovenia) at exactly the same time as Operation Desert Storm and the genocide of the Kurds that followed came to an end in April 1991. Then came a more violent struggle between Serbia and Croatia in August 1991, but was fortunately short-lived.

Thus, in April 1992 the first of the two most serious and major of the Balkans wars began in Bosnia-Herzogovina. It would also be the longest of the Balkans wars. To get 1999 right and identify the theatre of conflict as the former Yugoslavia (The Kosovo War), our intrepid base 7 prognosticator could have ill afforded to ignore that the war in Bosnia began in 1992.

On the other hand, if he/she had heeded the gum-up and extrapolated from 1987 to 1994, a confused mess would have been their lot long before 1999. The Balkans would not have been foreseen and Bosnia would be in its third year. As for the Middle East, save for a weak, ineffective second move to take Kuwait by Saddam Hussein, a move quickly repelled by Clinton within a week, 1994 would yield nothing else.

Would he/she have the nerve to push ahead for a war in the Middle East in 2001? With so much hanging on 1999 it is doubtful, but had they done so they would have been rewarded. And I did so ... and was right. 911 happened, then the war in Afghanistan, followed by the war between Israel and the West Bank/Lebanon/Syria in March and April 2002 and then the US war in Iraq a year later made my prediction technically correct, but wrong as to sequence and degree of conflict.

Now we await to see if a major Middle East war breaks out this year like no other one before it. Yet, even as we wait, have I taken into consideration the slight migration from Middle East/Persian Gulf to Afghanistan in Central Asia in 2001???? Instead of a war involving Iran and the US, Israel and Lebanon/Syria, Turkey and Iraq, all blending together are we instead heading for a repetition of Afghanistan and a migration into Pakistan and India???? Or will the actual Arab-Israeli conflict hold off until April 2009 and war with Iran until March 2010??? Will the dreaded Russian invasion of the Balkans and then Europe actually occur in 2012 or 2013??

World War III will either break out in the Middle East this autumn or begin no later than April 2009. World War III in Europe will follow by August 2009 ... UNLESS THERE IS A CEASEFIRE. Prospects for a ceasefire in August 2009 are very good. If that occurs, World War III will not begin again in the Middle East until a violation occurs in June-August 2011 with a Russian-Iranian blockade of the Persian Gulf. The crisis will stew until January 2012 and then all hell will break loose in the Middle East. World War III will then migrate via Turkey and the Balkans as a Russian-Iranian invasion of Europe in August 2012.

Aftermath will be horrible, beginning in either 2010 or 2013, depending on when WW3 in Europe begins (2009 or 2012). I will show with images and words in new 2010- 2016 pages (two sets of each year). I will show the events of a troubled but great "little peace" that may come from August 2009 until January 2012 if ceasefire is declared.

After WW3 is waged in Europe in either 2009 or 2012, I will show the resulting destruction of the United States and parts of Russia, civil wars in the UK, Italy, Germany, and Russian federation, revolution in France and a second reign of terror that will spread from France throughout seven other European nations, anti-Christian policies, mass exterminations, new religions demanding human sacrifice, a monstrous puppet leader shoved on to the people by the Muslims who will be like the beast of Revelation ... four or six years of horror, torture, suffering, and death before the people are at last liberated by a royal house of France in 2016 and the monster destroyed. This does not include the additional horror of plague that will arrive in April 2013.

However, it is possible we can avoid a ceasefire violation and postpone World War III until 2038 ... the year it is intended to begin.

Anyway, I am glad you are paying attention. I wish everyone would understand the system and its complexities as well as you seem to. I will certainly make mention by year's end of some of these mis-predicted events, if not give myself some well-deserved partial points for each.

Thanks again,

Mike

Brigade Homeland Tour

----- Original Message -----
From: Shaun
To: mmcclellan@adelphia.net
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 6:48 PM
Subject: Brigade Homeland Tour

Michael,

Check this link out. This scared the hell out of me when I read it. It's not good at all.

http://www.armytimes.com/news/2008/09/army_homeland_090708w/

- Shaun

*** * * * ***

Hi Shaun,

Hmmmm.. I don't know. Close reading of this article, if anything, is rather reassuring that the army is being trained to help civilians, not kill them .. for example training in the use of 'the jaws of life' and other life-saving procedures.. and of course crowd control and chaos in the event of an earthquake or terrorist attack. Even there they discuss non-lethal methods of crowd control, such as tasers and are hinting, I think, of the new microwave energy beam weapon they have developed. Let's face it, there will be chaos and rioting to some degree during a crisis ... we can't pretend there will be universal calm and cooperation. And why bother to 'save' lives if you are really planning on mass extermination?

This article was written for army people by army people and those interested in the armed forces, so there is no reason for the author to lie here.

Of course the issue of camps and the millions of plastic coffins is not addressed at all.

Regarding the plastic coffins it is not impossible that they were made in anticipation of a horrific disaster in the Eastern United States. I read a prophecy once somewhere that millions of people would be killed in the Eastern US after an asteroid impact or sudden sinking of a volcanic island in the Atlantic Ocean, either probably related to Planet X, and that these bodies would have to be shipped by trains to the northwest for burial in mass graves as quickly as possible to avoid the spread of disease that would break out from all the decay. So perhaps there is a logical explanation for all the coffins other than as evidence that there is a sinister government plan for mass depopulation.

As for the detention camps there is also an alternative explanation for that. The United States may be invaded from Central and South America by several million Latin American troops allied with Russia, China, Iran and Syria (and part of their militaries may be included in the number of invaders). I have dreamt such a scenario before happening in a summer month and there is base 7 evidence such an event could occur. I'm not sure, but I think there is even an actual prophecy about an invasion from the south.

In the event that occurs, there no longer is any mystery what the camps are for. When I look back at the huge number of Cuban refugees that came to the US in 1980 I start to think also: how many of the approximately 800 detention camps in the US would have been needed to house all those Cubans had they had them then? Since several million of them came over here, I would say quite a few of the camps would have been needed. As it was, due to the lack of such detention camps at that time, the government had to set up scores of makeshift camps all over the Florida panhandle and the Gulf of Mexico anywhere they could, including underneath expressways and freeways.

Yeah, and if that ever happened again, I'd prefer the barbed wire was pointed to keep the refugees in.

I have to admit there are credible scenarios to explain the existence of detention camps, double decker railroad cars, and huge numbers of plastic coffins.

But even if this is the real truth behind their existence, how many Americans would believe it??? Trust in the US leadership is currently at an all-time low and paranoia induced by Internet conspiracies is at an all-time high. I am not sure what to believe anymore myself.

Mike

Another popular Aussie presenter seriously injured in truck crash

----- Original Message -----
From: Louie
To: Mike
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2008 2:02 AM
Subject: Another popular Aussie presenter seriously injured in truck crash.

Hi Mike

hope you are coping well.

Well another Aussie presenter has been injured seriously in a monster truck accident. Grant Denyer's crushed a vertebrae in his back into about half a dozen pieces.
(http://news.ninemsn.com.au/entertainment/633099/denyer-injured-in-monster-truck-crash) Seems we have a lot of 'celebrity accidents' lately here in Aussieland.

While I still have you, I would like to bring up two Aussie personalities who have passed on in the past year.

Similar in the vein of Charmaine Dragun query. Sports commentator and a reality TV show contestant.

One of Aussie's original Big Brother housemate died in Sept 2007
(http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,22415081-662,00.html)

A well known and respected Australian sport commentator, Clinton Grybas died in January 5th this year (http://news.theage.com.au/sport/police-probe-commentator-grybas-death-20080105-1kbw.html and http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,23013577-601,00.html). His death was a mystery at first but concluded that he died while sleepwalking falling after hitting something in his apartment I believe..

I guess my query which is similar to Charmaine Dragun query, is: is there such a thing like sports presenter's or a reality star's death in previous years can repeat again 7 years later?

Thank you and as always look forward to hearing from you.

Louie

*** * * * ***

Hi Louie,

I'll run Grant Denyer through the name sound filter, along with a few others I haven't done yet. Don't be surprised if there are no important matches in certain cases. Celebrities, like regular people, DO die simply because they do and it has nothing to do with a special death line they happened to be on or whether their name matches some other celebrity. I do submit, however, that a pattern of coincidence that is more than mere coincidence occurs in the lives and deaths of the famous and infamous and, to some extent, regular people a large part of time. But certainly we can dimiss up to 25% of deaths, on average in any given year, as simply being random.

I have never done a study of sportcasters and reality stars to see if there are patterns or base 7 links. Reality TV is still too new or recent a phenomenon yet to conduct studies that are much more than 7 years old. Were there reality TV shows 14 years ago in 1994? I can't seem to recall any.

Even in the case of TV presenters, which go back as long as television has been around (60 years), we find cases of similar death of presenters corresponding to a base 7 timeline rather meagre. Most have died of natural causes. Technically the most outstanding cases thus far have been Chris Hubbock who committed suicide live on TV (who was a woman by the way, and not a man ... that is why I used her when trying to compare Jill Dando with Charmaine Dragun), Jessica Savitch, Jill Dando, Christopher Price, Peter Jennings, Mark Speight, and now Charmaine Dragun. And of course being a TV presenter can mean many and various things: from news shows to kiddie shows. In terms of the news, not many incidents have occurred despite 60 years of television.

Sportscasters, who can say? That requires an exhausting amount of research that may be well worth the trouble when things are relatively slow and I am caught up with my site. But that will be some time away yet.

No link is impossible. I am sure if the statistics were available, we could find patterns linking the deaths of professional jugglers, ventriloquists, gourmet chefs, chiefs of police, and even street cleaners ... especially if we are going to use examples from every country in the world. I would shudder to do a study of deaths in India where life is cheap and suicide is higher than anywhere else on the planet. So, of course, I have to narrow my research within a narrower, more reasonable field.

Adding Australia and, I suppose New Zealand, to a study of Western nations is understandable and has my approval, although some viewers may feel alienated by unfamiliar names (other than internationally known ones like Kylie Minogue, Geoffrey Rush, Nicole Kidman, Mel Gibson, or Olivia Newton-John or famous classic rock bands like AC/DC or Midnight Oil).

Now, of course, Asian celebrities from places like South Korea, Japan, China, India, and the Middle East are making inroads to Western media attention via the Internet ... people we otherwise might not even know about, save for about 1%. It makes the job more difficult using the base 7 system on a global scale where individuals are concerned. Still, it is amazing the patterns I have found, for example, with those who have chosen to fall from a high place (usually an apartment balcony) from Elizabeth Hartmann in the West, to Soud Hosni in Egypt, to Ruslana Korshunova of Kazakhstan, to Charmaine Dragun of Australia.

Incidentally, how popular are musical and film stars from the Oriental Asian nations like South Korea and Japan in Australia? It would seem to me that an Asian Pacific pantheon of stars would exist just as there are in UK/Europe or America.

Yes, sports presenters and reality TV star's, like all occupations, do without doubt, produce observable trends among their rank and file. We only have to find out what they are and who has been affected.

Mike

re:early 21st Century

----- Original Message -----
From: Trish
To: mmcclellan@roadrunner.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 4:14 AM
Subject: re:early 21st Century

Hello Michael

I've heard that Planet X could have a most devastating, catastrophic, for the entire earth. Is it possible that this planet could reverse our poles and creating such devastation?

How is that you see past 2016 and beyond????? I have studied the bible, and to the best of my recollection, NO BODY knows the hour not even the Son(Jesus) of when these things come to pass.

The future as you see it doesn't look to promising for my children or their children, all about wars, food shortages, lawlessness ... maybe I should live today, as if it were my last and enjoy it.

Kind regards Patricia.

Trish - -Patty!

*** * * * ***

Hello Trish,

There are many theories about what Planet X will do to Earth when it passes by ... WHEN it passes by (this cannot even be agreed upon). As to the "when" most prophecy says there will be a major "comet" that will cause some destruction to our planet in various ways at the same time that many nations are plagued by a great war (ie, "World War III"). Therefore, if various prophecies are correct, this object or comet will not come until we are in the midst of this great war at the point when Europe is attacked and invaded by "the East" ("Russia" or the "the Soviet Union" in some later prophecies). The originator of this prophecy, Daniel, however, identifies the adversary as the king of Persia (Iran) and his ally the king(s) of Media. Georgia is an example of one of the nations that were part of Media, and, as you can see, portions of it now are once again part of Russia. If Russia continues to absorb more former Soviet states into its structure, it becomes "king" of the Medes. Ergo, an Iranian-Russian alliance is "the East" that many prophets feared would invade Europe in our time and is distinctly identified by Daniel in Chapter 8 (and also mentioned in various places by Nostradamus in his book).

So, Planet X cannot come until the war is waged and reaches critical mass in Europe. If Planet X arrives in a time of peace or a limited level of conflict in some place like Iraq or Afghanistan, it would be going against prophecy. Obviously if there is a world war that is as bad as I described, we will have plenty other things to worry about besides Planet X anyway ... like nuclear war.

This world war need not happen in our lifetimes. It is possible for it to be postponed until the year 2038. So there is some hope in that for you .. and for all of us. If that is what happens then Planet X will not come until around the year 2044.

Yes, Planet X will, at some point, cause a "pole shift" of 90 degrees .. there is evidence of that in Revelation after the seventh seal has been opened and a third of the stars are shaken to the ground so that a third of the stars are no longer seen nor a third of the light shine by the moon and stars. If the earth's pole is shifted by that much, it will certainly change the way the stars and constellations will appear afterwards. Indeed, all the things mentioned from the opening of the sixth seal (the great planet earthquake, moon appears as blood, sun black as sackcloth, heavens rolled up like scroll, etc) through to the seventh seal and fourth trumpet sounded are related to various Planet X actions on our planet.

I do not see beyond 2016 nor do I say that man will definitely continue beyond 2016 (Nostradamus does).

Nostradamus says that most of the world will be destroyed by ignorant rulers, weapons, fire, and flood in the year 2243 (using the grand cycle of the Moon as his dating device). He also says that the end of seven thousand years of human history will arrive in 2242-43 in his Epistle to Henry II (written in 1558), claiming also that the seventh millennium began in 1242-43 and will end in 2242-43, for he tells his son four years earlier that they are living in the seventh millennium (when he wrote this in 1554, by his reckoning, that would have been true if it began in 1242-43). His view at the end of the seventh millennium, in 2243, follows Christian theology surprisingly exact for he says then the kingdom of Christ will begin and Satan will be bound and thrown into prison for a thousand years, after which time there will be one last uprising by people he identifies as Azostains (another word for infidels, unfaithful). Yet again, therefore, he is describing the final battle led by Satan after deceiving the nations of world (identified in Revelation as "Gog and Magog").

Nostradamus differs with the modern popular Christian view of when the date of the creation of Adam occurred. That is why Christians will say there are only 6000 years elapsed (4004 BC usually given as the date to begin counting from) and the millennial reign of Christ shall begin the seventh millennium (which is well overdue since that should have happened in 1996 or 1997 depending on whether one takes into account there was no year zero). Nostradamus set creation as being either 4756 BC or 4757 BC. His calculations are supported by the Abbot Trithemius, which are only ten years off, who wrote his discourse on the "Angel Ages" in 1503. Like the prophet Enoch, both men believed there would be seven thousand years of human history before the messianic age would begin, which would be the eighth millennium. Christian theology teaches 6000 years of human history as opposed to 7000 years of human history merely because in the Book of Genesis, God took 6 days to create the world and rested on the 7th. However, the truth is, most Old Testament era prophets believed there would be 7000 years from the time of creation before Man's rule would end and the awaited messiah's would begin.

Nevertheless, in the Book of Matthew Jesus does remind us that God shall shorten Man's years in the end times because if He does not "no flesh would survive." The question is how much will He shorten them by and in what sense? In Matthew is Jesus saying the 7000 years will be reduced to 6700 to 6800 years (meaning our era will end sometime between 1943 and 2043) or does it mean the beast will reign only 42 months because originally his reign was to last longer (Nostradamus says the beast reign is 25 years without divine intervention)? As you can see either way years are being shortened.

In any event, I present prophecies that clearly extend beyond our current time as though the prophets, like Nostradamus, claiming a much longer future than a handful of years remaining are correct. We cannot say for certain they are wrong.

At the same time, I look at the time in which we are living as possibly being at the brink of Tribulation. I must because God has said He will shorten the years and I cannot be sure what that means exactly. For this reason I engage in interpretation and discussion concerning the beast and false prophet and the whore of Babylon and other such features of Revelation from an end times perspective (ie, that we may indeed be living in the last 7-year period or very near it).

Personally, I believe we are approaching that part of Revelation that corresponds with the opening of the sixth seal. How long the time will run from there until the Second Coming I truly do not know. It could be years, decades, or even a few centuries.

I show the nightmare version of what will come, the worst case scenario, based on prophecy but also based on our own history which I truly do believe does repeat itself at intervals of seven years and also multiples of seven years (ie., 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49, 56, 63, etc).

I believe most future events that have been prophesied can be mitigated and I also believe that some future events can be postponed to a later time. Human free will does play a role in all of this. The events of Revelation may be written in stone, but they have been carefully presented by John without a timeframe, if you notice, until the beast and false prophet appear. Until these two actually appear, Man has some power over how long he can reign in this world through the power of faith and prayer ... and a bit of common sense if he has any left.

Yes, live today and plan for tomorrow. I do. Hope springs eternal, as they say. But for those of us who present and discuss prophecy, it is our job to alert the public as to where we may be headed. Thus, as Dickens reminds us in A Christmas Carol when Scrooge is shown his headstone by the Ghost of Christmas Future and queries in great dread and trepidation: 'Are these the shadows of the things that Will be, or are they shadows of things that May be, only? ... Men's courses will foreshadow certain ends, to which, if persevered in, they must lead. But if the courses be departed from, the ends will change. Say it is thus with what you show me!'

This is a question that haunts us all. But what Scrooge has reasoned out after putting the question in this classic ghost story can be the only answer for any of us, without the benefit of a spectre's assurance.

Take care,

Mike

STOP RIGHT THERE MR MCCLELLAN ... HAVE YOU BEEN ENTIRELY HONEST WITH THESE PEOPLE ABOUT
JOHN GIBSON'S INTERVIEW WITH SARAH PALIN??

----- Original Message -----
From: TATI
To: mmcclellan@adelphia.net
Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 2:53 PM

You referenced Sarah Palin's interview with John Gibson, but what must be taken into consideration is how edited it was when aired on ABC. In their full context, the transcript of which is provided in the link below, her remarks would appear to differ, sometimes significantly, from what was portrayed on television, particularly in her hostility toward Russia.
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/p-j-gladnick/2008/09/13/abc-news-edited-out-key-parts-sarah-palin-interview

*** * * * ***

Dear Tati,

You run a blog. I run a very large website which is a good deal more time-consuming. Except for another email reader (besides myself) who answers letters (and is away on vacation right now), I am doing this all alone.

I am viewing events from a prophetic perspective and, as such, am highly dependent on (allegedly) reputable news organisations and news services for factual evidence to support prophecies by major prophets as well as personal predictions I have made. I teach that history repeats itself at often regular intervals of multiples of seven years and demonstrate how often that actually does happen.

I simply do not have the time to pin down every news story to see if it is journalistically sound or biased. If that became my mission, that is all I would ever be doing.

I read the transcript and see what you mean. Nevertheless, although Palin's views are somewhat moderated by the material that was removed, it did not sway my overall view that she perceives Russia as a potential adversary at this time. She has made other comments to this effect outside of the interview in question. This interview is by no means the only source for such reports.

Still, I have to wonder why these comments were singled out for editing? Why were many of John Gibson's questions also deleted? He spent much quality time preparing his questions, why ask them only to delete them later? Is not his editing out of his own remarks as important as his editing out those of Sarah Palin's?

You do realise, I am sure, that a TV journalist must adhere to the demands placed upon his network by sponsors. He/she has only so much time allotted them to produce a final presentation of the interview. Much cutting is necessary. It is impossible to conduct a television interview and NOT delete comments. If many questions are asked and/or answers are quite lengthy, perhaps a third of all words exchanged will never be heard.

What is removed is up to the judgment of the interviewer and sometimes that can be a tough call. There is also something we can not know: what was Sarah Palin's body language saying at the time she made the remarks that were later deleted? If the interviewer is any good he can tell whether at some point when speaking the person he is engaging is being evasive or otherwise disingenuous. If that is the case, he may decide to delete such material and hold on to that which struck him as being truly candid.

A full transcript that is published for reading is no more or less the truth than an edited vocal interview unless we actually see the words being spoken.

Nevertheless, I shall provide your remarks and the link to your blog in my article so that my viewers can decide the truth, such as it may be, for themselves.

Most sincerely yours,

Mike

-----------------------------

Speaking of which, apparently Sarah Palin has been caught in one lie already. So how can we really know where she stands on Russia????

Palin never in Iraq, campaign now says
http://edition.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/13/palin.iraq/index.html

----- Original Message -----
From: TATI .
To: Mike
Sent: Sunday, September 14, 2008 3:46 AM
Subject: RE:

I understand your point, and by no means was I implying any irresponsibility on your part. Just figured I'd point out the article (of which the blog in question I do not run, by the way), since the ABC report didn't tell the whole story. And like you said, people can decide for themselves. Thank you for your time, I only recently discovered your site several weeks ago and am thoroughly hooked.

A woman's perspective on Palin

----- Original Message -----
From: Shelley
To: mmcclellan@adelphia.net
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 1:06 AM
Subject: A woman's perspective on Palin

Hi Mike,

I hope this is finding you well of late. As a single working Mom I would like to offer that not all of us are smitten with Mrs Palin. As I read the news I am crying for what I know will be lost, as surely as I knew what would be lost when GWB hit the scene. It's a gut instinct that makes me recoil when I look at her eyes or see her doing the Hitler hand salute.

She is indeed cruel - you need only read how she attacked the physical appearance of her opponents, or shoots animals from the air (the most cowardly way to hunt since the gun) and her insistence that polar bears are not endangered. Further, beauty queens place appearance above all else, so in essence our presidential race has been reduced to a meaningless reality show. Any woman who wants to deny abortion to a rape or incest victim - and make the rape victim pay for the rape kit to boot - is the definition of intolerance and cruelty.

I was horrified when I read she put more importance on making a speech and taking an 8 hour flight from Texas back to Alaska than her and her babies health when her water broke. It was a high risk pregnancy and she did not notify the airlines that she was going into labor. If she is willing to put her own childs health at risk to make a speech and put her own interests in front, but deny the rest of us the same control over our lives - imagine the depth of her disdain for anyone outside her circle.

Remember that no man knows the mind of God and while you may be keeping an open mind based on your calculations, my instincts are saying "Holy shit - we are so screwed".

Peace out,

Shelley

*** * * * ***

Hi Shelley,

Thanks for sending that along. It certainly opens my eyes to the reality that is Sarah Palin.

I have not had a chance to do much research on her, but I can see I have missed a whole lot. I had hoped that her being an Evangelist might be a good sign, but really doubted it when I read that she said she thought the war in Iraq was "a mission from God." That is crazy and her telling school children such crap is also crazy and dangerous. Unfortunately, and sad to say, many of the so-called Christians these days are dangerous lunatics.

Hitler hand salute to go with it too, eh? I don't know who I dread more: the Zionists or the anti-Zionists. Both sound like fanatics.

Well, I may quote some of this material when I have a chance as an update to the article. I will of course say it is from an anonymous source or sources (unless you would like your name addy 'Shelley' used). Besides, this would make a good letter for the email forum too, which hasn't been updated in quite a while (not for a lack of material, I will be backlogged forever) . . .

Anyway, thanks for sharing your views on Ms Palin and also for your concern about my health.

Take care,

Mike

Email Forum Archives (2)

Other Email Forums

* * * * *

NEWS FLASH on CNN , RAY MABUS named civilian leader of Navy

RAY MABUS, Raypoz ????? I know what you could be thinking, that possibly I am getting a bit to fond of C9 Q44. I hope that your fathers situation has improved, and the same for you. Friendly greeetings from Michael Skøtt Andersen / Copenhagen d'Annemarc

* * * * *

FEMA Camps

* * * * *

Trabzon, Turkey in news

* * * * *

New Aircrash soon ?

It was in the evening or night and the sky was dark and it would seem cloudy, at least I didnt see any stars.

I got at glimpse of the company name on the side of the jet. It was in blue text and said "KLM".

They can be found on Krak.dk or on GoogleEarth i guess, in case you would want a map of it.

I dont know if this was a plane taking of from Copenhagen International Airport Kastrup, or if it was arriving. Friendly Greetings Michael Skøtt Andersen / Copenhagen d'Annemarc

* * * * *

Anti-christ

TO Kathryn Wolfe and Mike McClellan

* * * * *

Victoria Bushfires repeated after 70 years.

Quick question about "Selin"

* * * * *

Nostradamus, Quatrain 10.62 ~

Near Sorbia [E. Germany] for to assail Hungary, the diplomat of Bude [Budapest] will come to warn them. The Byzantine chief, Salona of Slavonia, will come to convert to the law of the Arabs.

December 12th 2012

* * * * *

Sincerely Concerned

* * * * *

Promised Warrior?

* * * * *

Dear David, It is far from certain that Barack Obama is or ever was a Muslim: http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/front/6084678.html excerpt from:

UT poll shows McCain, Cornyn with comfortable margins

Poll finds 23% of Texans think Obama is Muslim

Obama is a Christian who was embroiled in a controversy earlier this year about his two-decade membership in Chicago's Trinity United Church of Christ. Yet just 45 percent of those polled identified the Illinois senator as a Protestant.

The Obama-is-a-Muslim confusion is caused by fallacious Internet rumors and radio talk-show gossip. McCain went so far at one of his town hall meetings to grab a microphone from a woman who claimed that Obama was an Arab.

The Texas numbers are unusual because most national polls show that just 5 to 10 percent of Americans still believe Obama is a Muslim — less than half the number of Texans who buy into the debunked theories ...

(UPDATE NOTE, 1-21-09: Hillary Clinton once again will qualify as the QOB of Revelation 18 in the role of US Secretary of State along with her reputation as former Senator of New York - MM)

Missed Predictions

* * * * *

Brigade Homeland Tour

* * * * *

Another popular Aussie presenter seriously injured in truck crash

* * * * *

re:early 21st Century

* * * * *

STOP RIGHT THERE MR MCCLELLAN ... HAVE YOU BEEN ENTIRELY HONEST WITH THESE PEOPLE ABOUT JOHN GIBSON'S INTERVIEW WITH SARAH PALIN??

----- Original Message ----- From: TATI To: mmcclellan@adelphia.net Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 2:53 PM

* * * * *

Dear Tati,

You run a blog. I run a very large website which is a good deal more time-consuming. Except for another email reader (besides myself) who answers letters (and is away on vacation right now), I am doing this all alone.

I simply do not have the time to pin down every news story to see if it is journalistically sound or biased. If that became my mission, that is all I would ever be doing.

A full transcript that is published for reading is no more or less the truth than an edited vocal interview unless we actually see the words being spoken.

Nevertheless, I shall provide your remarks and the link to your blog in my article so that my viewers can decide the truth, such as it may be, for themselves.

Most sincerely yours,

Mike

-----------------------------

Speaking of which, apparently Sarah Palin has been caught in one lie already. So how can we really know where she stands on Russia????

Palin never in Iraq, campaign now says http://edition.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/13/palin.iraq/index.html

A woman's perspective on Palin

----- Original Message ----- From: Shelley To: mmcclellan@adelphia.net Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 1:06 AM Subject: A woman's perspective on Palin

Hi Mike,

Remember that no man knows the mind of God and while you may be keeping an open mind based on your calculations, my instincts are saying "Holy shit - we are so screwed".

Peace out,

Shelley

* * * * *

Other Email Forums

*** * * * ***

RAY MABUS, Raypoz ?????

I know what you could be thinking, that possibly I am getting a bit to fond of C9 Q44.

I hope that your fathers situation has improved, and the same for you.

Friendly greeetings from

Michael Skøtt Andersen / Copenhagen d'Annemarc

*** * * * ***

*** * * * ***

*** * * * ***

I dont know if this was a plane taking of from Copenhagen International Airport Kastrup, or if it was arriving.

Friendly Greetings

Michael Skøtt Andersen / Copenhagen d'Annemarc

*** * * * ***

*** * * * ***

*** * * * ***

Near Sorbia [E. Germany] for to assail Hungary, the diplomat of Bude [Budapest] will come to warn them.
The Byzantine chief, Salona of Slavonia, will come to convert to the law of the Arabs.

*** * * * ***

*** * * * ***

*** * * * ***

Dear David,

It is far from certain that Barack Obama is or ever was a Muslim:

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/front/6084678.html

excerpt from:

*** * * * ***

*** * * * ***

*** * * * ***

*** * * * ***

STOP RIGHT THERE MR MCCLELLAN ... HAVE YOU BEEN ENTIRELY HONEST WITH THESE PEOPLE ABOUT
JOHN GIBSON'S INTERVIEW WITH SARAH PALIN??

----- Original Message -----
From: TATI
To: mmcclellan@adelphia.net
Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 2:53 PM

*** * * * ***

Palin never in Iraq, campaign now says
http://edition.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/13/palin.iraq/index.html

----- Original Message -----
From: Shelley
To: mmcclellan@adelphia.net
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 1:06 AM
Subject: A woman's perspective on Palin

*** * * * ***